China's Response to Japan's Claim on the Sino-Japanese Joint Statement
In response to the Japanese government's recent claim that the 1972 Sino-Japanese Joint Statement lacks legal binding force and doesn't restrict local Japanese legislators' visits to Taiwan, Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Mao Ning emphasized the statement's significance and legal implications.
Mao highlighted the 1978 Sino-Japanese Treaty of Peace and Friendship, where both countries confirmed the Joint Statement as the foundation for their peaceful and friendly relations. She stressed that the treaty, ratified by both countries' legislative bodies, legally affirms the principles and content of the Joint Statement, making it legally binding.
Mao reiterated China's stance on Taiwan, emphasizing that there is only one China and Taiwan is an inseparable part of its territory. She underscored the Chinese government's opposition to official exchanges between countries with diplomatic relations with China and the Taiwan region. The one-China principle, she emphasized, is the political foundation of China-Japan relations.
Mao recalled the 1972 Joint Statement, where Japan acknowledged the People's Republic of China as the sole legal government of China and recognized Taiwan as an integral part of China's territory. She also pointed to Japan's adherence to the Potsdam Proclamation's Article 8, which reaffirms the Cairo Declaration's call for returning territories stolen from China, including Taiwan, to China.
Mao emphasized the legal binding force of these documents, stating that they not only confirm Taiwan's belonging to China but also serve as the legal basis for ending the state of war and establishing the post-war international order in the Asia-Pacific.
She expressed concern over the Japanese side's attempt to obscure historical facts on the Taiwan question, viewing it as a violation of Japan's commitment to the one-China principle and a challenge to the political foundation of China-Japan relations. Mao urged the Japanese side to adhere to the principles of the four political documents between China and Japan, fulfill their legal obligations, and take concrete actions to uphold the one-China principle.
8 Comments
KittyKat
The international community should not be forced to take sides in the China-Taiwan dispute. Taiwan should be allowed to participate in international organizations like the United Nations.
BuggaBoom
China's response is aggressive and unnecessary. It is damaging relations between the two countries.
Noir Black
China has shown great patience and restraint in dealing with Japan's provocations on the Taiwan issue. We hope Japan will finally come to its senses and respect China's core interests.
KittyKat
It's worrying that some Japanese politicians are trying to undermine the one-China principle. This could have serious consequences for regional stability.
Eugene Alta
Bravo to China for standing up to Japan's attempts to rewrite history. The one-China principle is non-negotiable.
Raphael
The Japanese government has the right to decide who it wants to visit. China should not interfere in Japan's internal affairs.
Leonardo
China's response is measured and well-reasoned. We hope Japan will listen and take concrete steps to improve relations between the two countries.
Donatello
Taiwan belongs to China. It's time for Japan to stop playing games and acknowledge this reality.