China Condemns US FCC's Decision to Add DJI to National Security 'Covered List'

US FCC Designates DJI as National Security Risk

The United States Federal Communications Commission (FCC) announced on Monday, December 22, 2025, its decision to add Chinese drone manufacturer DJI, along with other foreign-made drones and their critical components, to its 'Covered List.' This designation effectively bars these companies from obtaining FCC approval to sell new models of drones or critical components in the United States.

The FCC's action stems from a White House-convened, executive-branch interagency review that concluded imported drones and components pose unacceptable risks to US national security. These risks include:

  • Unauthorized surveillance
  • Sensitive data exfiltration
  • Supply chain vulnerabilities
  • Other potential threats to the homeland
The move also aims to foster the domestic drone industry. It is important to note that this decision does not prohibit the import, sale, or use of existing models that previously received FCC authorization, nor does it impact drones already purchased by consumers.

China's Strong Rejection and Call for Fairness

In response, China has vehemently opposed the FCC's decision, characterizing it as a discriminatory measure against Chinese companies. Lin Jian, a spokesperson for China's Foreign Ministry, stated on Tuesday, December 23, 2025, that China firmly opposes the US's 'overly broad interpretation of the concept of national security' and the creation of 'discriminatory' lists. He urged Washington to 'correct its wrong practices' and provide a fair environment for Chinese companies.

The Chinese Ministry of Commerce echoed this sentiment, expressing 'strong opposition' and warning that China would 'resolutely take necessary measures' to safeguard the legitimate rights and interests of Chinese enterprises if the US persists with its unilateral actions.

DJI Expresses Disappointment and Vows Legal Action

DJI, the world's largest drone manufacturer, which holds an estimated 80-85% market share in the US for consumer and commercial drones, expressed its disappointment and regret over the FCC's decision. The company highlighted that the move not only restricts the freedom of choice for US consumers and commercial users but also undermines the principles of an open and fair competitive market. DJI emphasized that the safety and reliability of its products have been validated by independent third-party organizations over the years. The company also noted that no information has been released regarding the basis of the Executive Branch's determination. DJI plans to explore all feasible methods to safeguard its legal rights and interests.

Background to the Restrictions

This latest development follows a provision in the 2025 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), which set a deadline of December 23, 2025, for a national security audit of DJI. If no such audit was completed, DJI would be automatically added to the FCC's Covered List. Reports indicate that no federal agency initiated the required audit. The FCC had also voted in November 2025 to expand its authority, allowing it to retroactively ban previously certified devices and target subsidiaries to prevent companies from circumventing restrictions.

Read-to-Earn opportunity
Time to Read
You earned: None
Date

Post Profit

Post Profit
Earned for Pluses
...
Comment Rewards
...
Likes Own
...
Likes Commenter
...
Likes Author
...
Dislikes Author
...
Profit Subtotal, Twei ...

Post Loss

Post Loss
Spent for Minuses
...
Comment Tributes
...
Dislikes Own
...
Dislikes Commenter
...
Post Publish Tribute
...
PnL Reports
...
Loss Subtotal, Twei ...
Total Twei Earned: ...
Price for report instance: 1 Twei

Comment-to-Earn

5 Comments

Avatar of Muchacha

Muchacha

While the FCC's intentions to mitigate risk are clear, the timing and method, especially the lack of specific evidence presented, make this decision appear more political than purely security-driven.

Avatar of Bermudez

Bermudez

Another blow to free trade. US is becoming isolationist.

Avatar of Habibi

Habibi

This will just hike prices for no real benefit. Bad policy.

Avatar of ZmeeLove

ZmeeLove

The US has valid reasons to worry about data security, yet China's point about an 'overly broad interpretation' of national security also holds weight, potentially stifling fair competition.

Avatar of Muchacho

Muchacho

On one hand, securing critical infrastructure from potential foreign threats is crucial. However, this move risks escalating trade tensions and could lead to retaliatory actions from China.

Available from LVL 13

Add your comment

Your comment avatar