A recent match in the English FA Cup showcased the logo of social media platform X, previously known as Twitter, amidst ongoing discussions about the Online Safety Act. This legislation, which became active on July 25, imposes requirements on online services to shield children from harmful materials such as pornography.
X has voiced its concerns regarding the law, claiming that while its intentions are commendable, the extensive regulatory reach could hinder free speech. The platform described the government's approach as overly stringent, asserting that the emphasis on censorship under the guise of ensuring online safety could be problematic.
In response, a government spokesperson argued that the claim of compromised free speech due to the Online Safety Act is unfounded. They emphasized that the law not only mandates online safety measures for children but also upholds the importance of freedom of expression. The legislation specifies that platforms are only required to age-gate content with the highest risks, such as pornography and material related to self-harm.
Failure to comply with the new regulations could lead to significant penalties for online platforms, including fines of up to £18 million or 10% of global revenues, whichever amount is larger. The government has stated that platforms have had ample time to adapt to these requirements.
6 Comments
Manolo Noriega
Kids will find ways around restrictions regardless; this law really doesn't solve the root problem.
Fuerza
This is just another way for the government to control what we see online. Free speech is being attacked under the guise of 'safety.'
Manolo Noriega
This law is a perfect excuse to restrict legitimate discourse online. It's scary to think where this could lead.
Ongania
Free speech is important, but it shouldn't come at the cost of children's safety. Balance is needed!
Manolo Noriega
Platforms like X need to take responsibility to ensure that children are protected from harmful materials.
dedus mopedus
The government's approach to online safety is commendable. Children’s welfare should always come first.