Education

Ohio Explores Law School Accreditation Changes After Trump’s Executive Order on DEI

In April, President Donald Trump enacted an executive order that has substantial implications for higher education accreditation, particularly surrounding issues of diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI). According to an article by Elizabeth Troutman Mitchell in The Daily Signal, this order restricts accreditors from engaging in unlawful discrimination based on DEI principles. Recently, Ohio announced that it would reevaluate its law school accreditation process, aligning with similar actions taken by states such as Florida and Texas, and reinforcing Ohio's emerging identity as a Republican stronghold.

To facilitate this review, Ohio Supreme Court Chief Justice Sharon L. Kennedy has appointed Robert W. Horner, III, as the chairman of an advisory committee tasked with reconsidering the state's accreditation practices. Horner, who serves as the administrative director of the Supreme Court of Ohio, emphasized that the court is responsible for overseeing all aspects of an attorney's professional journey in Ohio. This involves a commitment to maintaining the integrity and effectiveness of the legal profession through continuous assessment and openness to new ideas.

The advisory committee consists of a diverse group of legal practitioners, including law school deans and state legislators. Prominent members include Mary Amos Augsburger, the CEO of the Ohio State Bar Association, and key figures like senators and representatives from Ohio's legislature. Republican state representative Brian Stewart has expressed strong criticism of the American Bar Association (ABA), deeming it a monopolistic entity in law school accreditation. He supports the formation of the committee and advocates for exploring alternative accreditation avenues beyond the ABA, which he believes has lost credibility.

Furthermore, coverage from the ABA Journal has reflected on the impact of Trump's executive order on DEI standards, highlighting the ABA’s recent decision to suspend Standard 206, which focused on DEI issues, until August 2026. This shift signifies growing pressures and changes in the higher education sector concerning DEI. According to Robert Stilson, a senior research analyst, the prior administration had heavily emphasized DEI within the Department of Education, contrasting sharply with Trump’s initiatives aimed at reducing its influence in education.

Read-to-Earn opportunity
Time to Read
You earned: None
Date

Post Profit

Post Profit
Earned for Pluses
...
Comment Rewards
...
Likes Own
...
Likes Commenter
...
Likes Author
...
Dislikes Author
...
Profit Subtotal, Twei ...

Post Loss

Post Loss
Spent for Minuses
...
Comment Tributes
...
Dislikes Own
...
Dislikes Commenter
...
Post Publish Tribute
...
PnL Reports
...
Loss Subtotal, Twei ...
Total Twei Earned: ...
Price for report instance: 1 Twei

Comment-to-Earn

5 Comments

Avatar of Bella Ciao

Bella Ciao

Unlawful discrimination based on DEI principles"? What does THAT even mean in practice? Sounds like code.

Avatar of Comandante

Comandante

They're trying to dismantle the checks and balances that protect diverse students.

Avatar of Africa

Africa

This is just a thinly veiled attack on diversity initiatives masked as "neutral" accreditation reform. Shameful.

Avatar of Bermudez

Bermudez

The only "diversity" they care about is diversity of thought - meaning, enforcing their ideology.

Avatar of Africa

Africa

Reducing the government's (or the ABA's) influence on education is a good thing. Competition promotes better outcomes.

Available from LVL 13

Add your comment

Your comment avatar