In Yorkshire, Kirklees Council, which is run by the Labour party, has faced severe backlash for its decision to privatize two dementia care facilities. Families of residents and local councillors have expressed their discontent over the council's plan for Claremont House in Heckmondwike and Castle Grange in Newsome, insisting that the decision lacks a foundation in credible evidence. The council asserts that they arrived at this contentious conclusion after going through "a long process of evaluation, engagement, and public scrutiny," citing financial reasons for the switch to private care. However, community activists are unconvinced and intend to challenge this move legally.
The legal firm Irwin Mitchell is representing the families of the residents and has sought a judicial review of the council's decision. Rebecca Chapman, a human rights lawyer involved in the case, highlighted the significant repercussions that privatization could have on residents, especially those living with dementia, who require stable care environments. Many families, who have been vocal about their dissatisfaction with how the council handled the situation, worry that their loved ones will suffer from the impending changes. Chapman stated that first-hand accounts have revealed the deep concerns felt by families over potential disruptions in care as a result of privatization.
In a previous attempt to save costs, Kirklees Council aimed to close the care homes to generate nearly £47 million in financial savings but was met with strong opposition from activists. Following this, they shifted their strategy to privatization, confirming this decision in a council meeting held in February. Residents such as 90-year-old Brenda at Castle Grange have family members, like Adrian Pygott, expressing grave concerns regarding the potential impact of this transition. Pygott noted that his mother has highly sensitive emotional needs and any alterations in her care routine could cause her distress. Additionally, he emphasized that the current care staff are exceptional and that losing this support would be detrimental for both his mother and other residents.
In response to the backlash, Kirklees Council stated that they are committed to maintaining high standards of care for all residents and mentioned that the matter is currently undergoing legal proceedings, prompting them to refrain from further comments or exploring alternative solutions until the judicial review's outcome is determined.
5 Comments
Donatello
While the loss of the current familiar staff may be hard. The council's aim to improve care is fair.
Leonardo
The council needs to prioritize the well-being of its citizens, not some bottom line.
Raphael
I'm supporting the legal challenge! This needs to be stopped.
Muchacho
(Assuming efficiency) Maybe the private sector can provide better care at a lower cost. We can only hope.
Bella Ciao
This is an absolute disgrace! Profit over people, always. Shame on Kirklees Council.