Badenoch Accuses Starmer of Evading Scrutiny Amidst Internal Party Concerns

Kemi Badenoch has intensified her criticism of Keir Starmer, accusing him of avoiding scrutiny by missing Prime Minister's Questions. This follows his absence from the sessions for two consecutive weeks. She made these remarks during a debate after the G7 and NATO summits, where she claimed Starmer was "evading" accountability. Badenoch criticized Starmer's statement, calling it weak and suggesting he was simply repeating information already available in the news.

Sir Keir Starmer responded by accusing Badenoch of downplaying the significance of the summits. This exchange also drew criticism from within Badenoch's own party. Mark Pritchard, a Conservative MP, defended Starmer's recent absences, emphasizing the importance of keeping partisan politics separate from national security matters.

When asked if she would discipline Pritchard for his comments, Badenoch doubled down on her criticism of the Prime Minister. She stated that she enjoys answering questions, unlike the Prime Minister, and suggested that the timing of PMQs could be changed. She further claimed that Starmer avoids answering questions during the sessions. Despite the criticism from her own MP, Badenoch indicated she would not be taking action against him.

This situation unfolds amidst broader concerns within the Conservative party regarding their current polling numbers. Reports suggest growing anxiety among Conservative MPs about the party's standing. Badenoch's personal satisfaction rating has reportedly reached a low point, making her the most unpopular opposition leader after six months. A shadow minister expressed concern about the polls, noting a decline in support and a lack of engagement in the national conversation. The magazine warns of a potential leadership challenge if the situation doesn't improve.