In a recent episode of the Joe Rogan Experience podcast, political commentator Douglas Murray confronted Rogan about his decision to host guests who propagate conspiracy theories and misinformation. During the discussion, Murray took aim at several guests, including comedian Dave Smith, who was present, as part of a broader critique regarding the potential dangers of giving a voice to individuals who share "counterhistorical stuff."

One particular point of contention for Murray was the participation of podcaster Darryl Cooper, who sparked controversy with his assertion that Winston Churchill was a significant antagonist in World War II and distorted perspectives on the Holocaust. Murray, recognized for his strong support of Israel amidst the ongoing Israel-Hamas conflict, has faced accusations of promoting anti-Islam sentiments, including advocating for limitations on Muslim immigration to Europe.

Throughout the episode, Murray expressed his discontent with how Rogan and Smith defended Cooper's controversial views, implying that simply posing questions does not excuse the dissemination of potentially harmful narratives. He argued that there comes a point when the dialogue shifts from inquiry to presenting definitive opinions, which can mislead audiences.

Responses to Murray's critiques on social media were mixed, with some praising him for challenging Rogan. Users highlighted his call for Rogan to invite qualified historians to discuss historical topics. Conversely, others rebuked Murray, questioning his stance on expertise considering he has commented on regions he hasn't personally visited, such as Iran and North Korea.

As the debate unfolded, Smith countered Murray's claims, suggesting that he exhibited selective empathy regarding victims of conflict, pointing to civilian suffering in Gaza. The discussion highlighted tensions around the ethics of discussing complex geopolitical issues without firsthand experience and sparked considerable conversation online. Critics of Murray labeled him as elitist and narrow-minded in his approach during the exchange, intensifying the ongoing discourse surrounding expertise and public dialogue on sensitive topics.