Hundreds of employees at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), notably meteorologists and weather forecasters, have recently lost their positions. According to lawmakers, scientists, and federal workers, these job terminations could have significant consequences for local weather forecasting abilities across the U.S. National Weather Service offices.

Craig McLean, former chief scientist at NOAA, said the layoffs occurred over two separate phases, initially affecting around 500 workers and later approximately 800 more, totaling about 10 percent of NOAA's workforce. McLean highlighted that probationary employees, especially critical to the National Weather Service operations, had been specifically targeted during these rounds.

The layoffs are part of a broader federal employment reduction advocated by Elon Musk and his Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). The initiative aligns closely with President Donald Trump's previous critiques about federal bureaucracy being bloated and inefficient. Indeed, thousands of probationary employees from multiple government agencies have already been impacted by these workforce reductions.

Prominent politicians expressed strong opposition and criticism regarding these layoffs. Democratic Representative Grace Meng argued that the terminations at NOAA were unjustifiable, emphasizing the vital work done by the dismissed employees in protecting American lives and property from natural disasters. Similarly, Representative Jared Huffman, a Democrat from California and senior member of the House Natural Resources Committee, confirmed the dismissal of hundreds of NOAA scientists and experts.

Daniel Swain, a climate scientist affiliated with UCLA, expressed concern on social media, calling the cuts excessively short-sighted. He warned that such dismissals could seriously compromise public safety, exposing Americans to greater risks from weather- and climate-related events and hurting the national economy's resilience.

The layoffs at NOAA coincide with similar actions at other federal agencies. Earlier in the week, approximately 1,600 employees at the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) were terminated without adequate notice, prompting widespread criticism. Agencies heavily impacted by recent job cuts also include the Internal Revenue Service, losing 6,700 jobs; the Defense Department, with 5,400 job losses; and the Department of Agriculture, which lost 3,400 positions.

While the administration has not yet released official details on the actual scale of the terminations, reports indicate employees with fewer than 12 months of employment have disproportionately borne the brunt due to their limited job protections.