China's Three Gorges Dam, a monumental feat of engineering, is located in Hubei province and spans the Yangtze River, the longest river in Eurasia. Construction of this massive hydroelectric project began in 1994 and took nearly a decade, culminating in a total expenditure estimated at £29 billion. Standing at 181 meters high and 2,335 meters long, it holds an impressive 27.2 million cubic meters of water and boasts a maximum power capacity of 22,500 megawatts, supporting the energy needs of approximately 5.4 million households for a month when at full capacity.
The dam's construction coincided with scientific investigations prompted by the devastating 2004 Boxing Day earthquake and tsunami, which initiated research into how significant geological shifts could influence the Earth's rotation. Changes in mass distribution due to tectonic plate movements were found to affect the Earth's "Moment of Inertia," leading to a reduction in the length of a day by 2.68 microseconds. A NASA geophysicist, Dr. Benjamin Fong Chao, indicated that the mass relocation caused by filling the Three Gorges Dam could similarly lengthen days by 0.06 microseconds and shift the Earth's poles by around two centimeters. Although these changes are marginal in everyday life, they could complicate high-precision timekeeping, prompting discussions among scientists about implementing a negative leap second in the near future.
The dam's construction was not without considerable social cost, as it necessitated the relocation of roughly 1.3 million people whose homes were submerged. Besides electrification, the dam aims to enhance shipping on the Yangtze River and decrease flood risks downstream through its flood storage capabilities. The Chinese government heralds the dam as a historic success in engineering and environmental policy, highlighting the use of advanced turbines and a commitment to reducing greenhouse gas emissions. Nonetheless, the project has drawn criticism for flooding irreplaceable archaeological and cultural locations while also contributing to environmental degradation and heightening landslide risks. The extensive construction used an unprecedented 27.2 million cubic meters of concrete and 463,000 tonnes of steel, comparable to the materials required to build 63 Eiffel Towers, while displacing more than 102.6 million cubic meters of earth.
9 Comments
dedus mopedus
1.3 million people displaced? That's a humanitarian crisis! How can we celebrate a project that ruins lives?
lettlelenok
The flooding of archaeological sites is a tragedy for our shared history. What a shame to sacrifice the past for power!
Rotfront
The Three Gorges Dam may have challenges, but the benefits to commerce and energy are undeniable.
ytkonos
I'm not convinced that the benefits outweigh the environmental degradation. It feels like a lost opportunity for sustainability.
Matzomaster
The destruction of cultural heritage is too high a price to pay for this project. Those historical sites should have been preserved!
Comandante
So much concrete and steel for power—what a waste! We should focus on renewable, sustainable energy instead.
Mariposa
Innovation is key to progress, and this dam represents a commitment to harnessing technological advancements for the greater good.
Habibi
While it generates power, the environmental cost is staggering. We can't ignore the increased risk of landslides.
Muchacha
We need big projects like this to meet the energy demands of the future. It's a necessary evolution for our civilization.