New Bilateral Health Agreements Signed
The United States officially signed four new global health memorandums of understanding (MoUs) on December 23, 2025, with Madagascar, Sierra Leone, Botswana, and Ethiopia. These agreements collectively amount to nearly $2.3 billion over a five-year period, marking a significant step in the US 'America First Global Health Strategy'. The US commitment totals approximately $1.4 billion, while the four African nations have pledged to mobilize over $900 million in domestic resources as co-investment.
'America First' Approach to Global Health
This initiative is a core component of the 'America First Global Health Strategy,' which was launched in September 2025. The strategy represents a shift from traditional aid models, focusing instead on results-driven partnerships, strict implementation timelines, and monitoring mechanisms that include explicit consequences for non-compliance. The US State Department has stated that this approach is 'aimed at ensuring that American health assistance delivers measurable outcomes while reducing long-term dependence by recipient countries'. It prioritizes bilateral, government-to-government agreements over multilateral mechanisms and the traditional role of non-governmental organizations.
Targeted Health Initiatives by Country
The MoUs outline specific health priorities for each partner nation:
- For Ethiopia, the agreement focuses on investments addressing HIV/AIDS, tuberculosis, malaria, polio eradication, maternal and child health, and infectious disease preparedness. It also includes ongoing support for the country's response to the Marburg virus.
- Botswana's agreement includes plans to modernize electronic medical records and enhance disease surveillance systems.
- In Sierra Leone, the US plans to front-load more than $30 million in 2026 to rapidly strengthen disease surveillance, laboratory capacity, the health workforce, and data systems.
- Madagascar's agreement targets investments in malaria, maternal and child health, and global health security, alongside transitioning the infectious disease-focused community health workforce to national ownership.
Broader Context of US Engagement in Africa
These four agreements expand upon a framework initiated earlier in December 2025 with Kenya, Uganda, and Rwanda. Other African nations that have recently signed similar bilateral health pacts under this strategy include Eswatini, Lesotho, Mozambique, Cameroon, Nigeria, and Liberia. The new model emphasizes shared financial responsibility and accountability, with the aim of fostering self-reliance in the health sectors of partner countries.
9 Comments
Raphael
Forcing co-investment on developing nations feels exploitative. They need help, not more pressure.
Leonardo
While the focus on measurable outcomes is commendable, shifting away from established multilateral organizations could create gaps in service delivery.
Raphael
Great to see the US investing in global health and demanding co-investment. Win-win!
Donatello
Strengthening national health systems is vital, but the explicit consequences for non-compliance could be overly punitive, hindering genuine partnership and capacity building.
Raphael
Finally, a smart aid strategy! Accountability is key.
Noir Black
Direct government-to-government is more efficient. Less bureaucracy, more impact.
KittyKat
'America First' in global health? Sounds like thinly veiled self-interest.
Katchuka
Cutting out NGOs and multilateral groups is a huge mistake. Less effective reach.
Loubianka
This 'America First' approach makes sense. Results, not just handouts.