Belgium Expresses Strong Regret Over US Sanctions
Belgium has voiced strong regret and concern following the United States' imposition of new sanctions on two judges of the International Criminal Court (ICC). The sanctions, announced on Thursday, December 18, 2025, targeted judges Gocha Lordkipanidze of Georgia and Erdenebalsuren Damdin of Mongolia. Belgium's Foreign Minister, Maxime Prévot, stated that these measures 'further undermine judicial independence and efforts to fight impunity,' reiterating Belgium's steadfast support for the ICC's independent and impartial mandate.
Details of the Sanctions and US Justification
The latest sanctions were announced by US Secretary of State Marco Rubio, who accused the two judges of being 'directly engaged' in 'the illegitimate targeting of Israel.' Specifically, the sanctions followed the judges' vote on an ICC decision on December 15, 2025, which rejected Israel's appeal to halt an ongoing investigation into alleged Israeli crimes in Gaza. The United States, which is not a member of the ICC, has consistently argued that the court lacks jurisdiction over US or Israeli personnel.
Widespread European Condemnation
Belgium's condemnation was echoed by several other European countries, highlighting a collective concern over the US actions. Nations including Finland, France, Denmark, Spain, the Netherlands, and Norway also expressed regret and reaffirmed their support for the ICC's independence. The European Union as a whole has previously stated its 'deep regret' over US sanctions against ICC officials and affirmed its 'unwavering support' for the court, emphasizing that the ICC 'must be free to act without pressure.'
ICC Rejects Sanctions as 'Flagrant Attack'
The International Criminal Court itself has strongly rejected the US sanctions, describing them as a 'flagrant attack' against its independence and an affront to its 125 member states. The ICC maintains its commitment to its mandate of delivering justice for victims of international crimes, despite external pressures. This latest round of sanctions follows previous measures taken by the US against ICC officials, including former prosecutor Fatou Bensouda and Phakiso Mochochoko in 2020, and other judges and prosecutors in June and August 2025.
6 Comments
Leonardo
While judicial independence is crucial for international justice, the US has legitimate concerns about the ICC's jurisdiction over non-member states. A diplomatic solution is needed to bridge this gap.
eliphas
ICC has no jurisdiction over sovereign nations like US or Israel. US is right.
anubis
On one hand, the ICC's role in holding individuals accountable for grave crimes is essential for global peace and justice. On the other, the US consistently argues against its jurisdiction over non-signatories, making these clashes almost inevitable without a clearer international consensus on judicial authority.
eliphas
Judicial independence is paramount. US is wrong here.
anubis
Europe standing strong against US bullying. Bravo!
eliphas
Why is Belgium defending a politicized court? Protect our allies.