Baikonur Launchpad Damaged After Soyuz MS-28 Launch to International Space Station

Key Launchpad Sustains Damage

The Baikonur Cosmodrome in Kazakhstan, a vital hub for Russian space operations, sustained significant damage to one of its primary launchpads on Thursday, November 27, 2025. The incident occurred shortly after the successful liftoff of the Soyuz MS-28 mission, which carried a three-person crew to the International Space Station (ISS).

The mission, aboard a Soyuz-2.1a rocket, launched from Launch Pad 31/6 (also known as Site 31) at 12:27 Moscow time. Onboard were Russian cosmonauts Sergey Kud-Sverchkov and Sergey Mikayev, alongside NASA astronaut Chris Williams, all of whom safely docked with the ISS later the same day.

Details of the Damage

Post-launch inspections revealed that a crucial component of the launch complex, the movable servicing cabin (also referred to as a service platform or service tower), collapsed into the exhaust trench beneath the pad. This structure is essential for providing access to the rocket's lower stages and for preparing both crewed Soyuz and uncrewed Progress missions.

Roscosmos, Russia's state space corporation, confirmed that 'damage to several elements of the launch pad was detected' following standard inspection procedures. Independent reports and imagery suggest the damage to the service cabin, which holds the rocket in place and provides engineer access, was extensive.

Implications for Russia's Space Program

The damage to Launch Pad 31/6 carries significant implications for Russia's human spaceflight capabilities. Since 2018 (or 2020), this particular pad has been Russia's only operational facility for launching crewed Soyuz missions to the ISS. Analysts warn that the incident effectively leaves Russia temporarily unable to conduct crewed launches, marking the first such disruption since 1961.

The collapse of the service cabin could lead to indefinite delays for future missions, including the planned Progress MS-33 cargo flight scheduled for December. While the crew aboard the ISS remains safe, the incident raises questions about the continuity of Russian contributions to the orbital outpost.

Official Response and Expert Outlook

Roscosmos stated that it possesses 'all necessary spare parts' and vowed to repair the cosmodrome 'in the near future,' expecting the damage to be 'eliminated very soon.' However, space analysts and independent media outlets have offered more cautious assessments. Experts like Anatoly Zak of RussianSpaceWeb.com suggest that repairs could take anywhere from months to up to two years. This extended timeline could necessitate exploring alternative launch sites, such as Vostochny, or deepening cooperation with international partners to maintain access to orbit.

Read-to-Earn opportunity
Time to Read
You earned: None
Date

Post Profit

Post Profit
Earned for Pluses
...
Comment Rewards
...
Likes Own
...
Likes Commenter
...
Likes Author
...
Dislikes Author
...
Profit Subtotal, Twei ...

Post Loss

Post Loss
Spent for Minuses
...
Comment Tributes
...
Dislikes Own
...
Dislikes Commenter
...
Post Publish Tribute
...
PnL Reports
...
Loss Subtotal, Twei ...
Total Twei Earned: ...
Price for report instance: 1 Twei

Comment-to-Earn

5 Comments

Avatar of Manolo Noriega

Manolo Noriega

Roscosmos really needs to get its act together. Safety should be paramount.

Avatar of Fuerza

Fuerza

The damage is significant, and Roscosmos's optimistic repair timeline seems unrealistic compared to expert analysis. This could force a re-evaluation of launch dependencies and international partnerships.

Avatar of Manolo Noriega

Manolo Noriega

While this incident certainly highlights the aging infrastructure at Baikonur, it also underscores the delicate nature of international space collaboration. We need robust systems for everyone's safety.

Avatar of Ongania

Ongania

A huge blow to human spaceflight. We need all partners operating effectively.

Avatar of Fuerza

Fuerza

Regardless of who owns the launchpad, a setback like this affects everyone who relies on space access. However, it does raise valid questions about maintenance and contingency planning for critical facilities.

Available from LVL 13

Add your comment

Your comment avatar