São Paulo's Tip Tax Sparks Controversy Among Bar and Restaurant Federation

Federation Challenges State's Tip Taxation

The Federação de Hotéis, Restaurantes e Bares do Estado de São Paulo (Fhoresp), a prominent federation representing the hospitality sector in São Paulo, Brazil, has voiced strong opposition to the state's taxation of tips. The entity has labeled the Imposto sobre Circulação de Mercadorias e Serviços (ICMS) levied on gratuities exceeding 10% of a customer's bill as 'arbitrary' and 'unjust', arguing it unfairly penalizes workers.

In response, the Secretaria da Fazenda e Planejamento do estado de São Paulo has affirmed that the rule governing this taxation has been in effect since 2012, established by Decreto 58.375/2012, and has not undergone changes.

The Discrepancy: State Decree vs. Federal Law

The core of the controversy lies in the application of a state decree amidst a federal law. While the federal Lei da Gorjeta (Law No. 13.419/2017) stipulates that voluntarily given tips are exempt from taxes, São Paulo's state decree mandates a 4% ICMS tax on any portion of the tip that surpasses 10% of the total bill.

Fhoresp contends that tips are 'bonifications for good services rendered' and should not be considered revenue for the establishment, thus making their taxation 'absurd' and 'inhumane'. The federation highlights that the 2017 federal law integrated tips into employees' remuneration, requiring their registration in payslips for social security and income tax purposes.

Industry's Adaptation and Current Impact

Following the 2017 federal legislation, many establishments in São Paulo increased their suggested service charges to 12%, 13%, or even 15%. This adjustment was made to compensate workers for the new social charges and income tax declarations resulting from tips being incorporated into their formal remuneration, aiming to prevent a reduction in their net earnings.

Fhoresp argues that taxing this difference, which was intended as a compensatory measure for employees, is 'wrong' and 'penalizes the worker' directly. The state government, however, has recently intensified its fiscalization efforts, leading to increased scrutiny and autuations against establishments.

Official Actions and Ongoing Dialogue

In an effort to resolve the issue, Fhoresp has formally submitted an official letter to Governor Tarcísio de Freitas and the Secretary of State for Finance and Planning, Samuel Kinoshita, urging a review of the taxation policy. Additionally, the federation is engaging with the Conselho Nacional de Política Fazendária (Confaz), which includes representatives from all Brazilian states' finance secretariats, to advocate for nationwide exemption regulation.

The Secretary of Finance and Planning has acknowledged receipt of Fhoresp's request, stating that the plea will be 'analyzed considering all applicable rules'. The government maintains that while the rule itself has not changed, the reinforcement of fiscalization aims to ensure compliance with the existing norm.

Read-to-Earn opportunity
Time to Read
You earned: None
Date

Post Profit

Post Profit
Earned for Pluses
...
Comment Rewards
...
Likes Own
...
Likes Commenter
...
Likes Author
...
Dislikes Author
...
Profit Subtotal, Twei ...

Post Loss

Post Loss
Spent for Minuses
...
Comment Tributes
...
Dislikes Own
...
Dislikes Commenter
...
Post Publish Tribute
...
PnL Reports
...
Loss Subtotal, Twei ...
Total Twei Earned: ...
Price for report instance: 1 Twei

Comment-to-Earn

8 Comments

Avatar of Fuerza

Fuerza

It's tough because workers depend on tips, but states do need revenue sources. There's a clear conflict between state and federal law that needs a clear resolution, not just more fiscalization.

Avatar of Manolo Noriega

Manolo Noriega

The rule has been there since 2012. Why complain now? Pay your dues.

Avatar of Fuerza

Fuerza

Fhoresp's concerns about worker compensation are legitimate, especially given the federal law. However, the state's perspective on a long-standing decree indicates a need for clearer legal harmonization rather than just battling over enforcement.

Avatar of Ongania

Ongania

Businesses are just trying to avoid paying their fair share. Don't fall for the 'worker's plight' card.

Avatar of Fuerza

Fuerza

While I agree that workers shouldn't be unfairly penalized, the article mentions establishments increased service charges to 12-15%. That extra percentage might be seen as a business revenue component by the state, complicating the 'tip' definition.

Avatar of ytkonos

ytkonos

On one hand, taxing tips feels wrong as it directly impacts service staff's take-home pay. On the other hand, if businesses are charging 15% and calling it a 'tip,' it blurs the line for what constitutes a voluntary gratuity versus a service fee.

Avatar of lettlelenok

lettlelenok

The federal law aims to protect workers, yet São Paulo's decree seems to undermine that intent. Both sides have valid points regarding income and taxation, but the current discrepancy creates an unstable environment for businesses and employees alike.

Avatar of dedus mopedus

dedus mopedus

Fhoresp is doing the right thing. This state tax is an attack on hospitality staff.

Available from LVL 13

Add your comment

Your comment avatar