Tesla is rolling out its "Full Self-Driving (Supervised)" (FSD) mode in Australia and New Zealand, but it's not truly driverless. It's an advanced driver assistance system (Level 2), requiring drivers to remain attentive and ready to take control. The term "full self-driving" is misleading.
This follows scrutiny, including a video of a Tesla driving without a driver's hands on the wheel, which authorities hadn't approved. It highlights ongoing concerns about regulations, safety, and public trust.
FSD allows lane changes, interchange navigation, and automatic stops, but has limitations. The driver must be prepared to intervene. Tesla's approach relies on cameras and AI, which critics say makes it vulnerable.
Tesla's push is partly about the robotaxi market. While trials are expanding globally, true autonomy (Level 5) doesn't exist yet.
Liability in crashes is complex. For Level 2 cars, the driver is responsible. For true self-driving, it could fall on the manufacturer.
how safe must autonomous systems be before replacing human drivers? True autonomy demands the ability to interpret complex human behavior, and until then, the driver remains in charge.
6 Comments
Comandante
Saw the video. Absolutely terrifying. How can they launch this without proper regulatory approval?
Bella Ciao
Cameras and AI? Doesn't inspire confidence. What about adverse weather conditions or unexpected events?
Muchacha
Yes, it's Level 2 now, but it's a continuous upgrade. Early adopters will get the latest and greatest. The more this is on public roads, the faster it'll improve.
Mariposa
The goal is Level 5 but a step-by-step approach makes the most sense and hopefully a safer experience.
Donatello
Robotaxi dreams aside, this isn't ready for prime time. The technology is still too unreliable.
lettlelenok
Misleading marketing! Calling it 'Full Self-Driving' is a blatant lie. They should be fined for false advertising!