Why Legal Protection is Paramount for Securing Rights

Recently, Bishop Robert Barron criticized a statement I made during a Senate hearing concerning the source of legal rights. The hearing included testimony suggesting that these rights originate from a Creator, rather than from laws or governments. I find this perspective, which Bishop Barron seems to support, troubling.

I do, of course, agree with the Declaration of Independence, penned by Thomas Jefferson, which states that all individuals are granted certain inherent rights by the Creator, including life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. However, my experiences, including working with Catholic missionaries in Honduras during a military dictatorship and later as a civil rights lawyer, have taught me that rights are essentially ineffective unless they are safeguarded by law.

Consider the origins of specific rights. Where do we find the right to a trial by jury, the right to bear arms, freedom of the press, protection from cruel and unusual punishment, the right to due process regarding property, the right to peaceful assembly and petition, or the right to vote? These rights are not explicitly detailed in religious texts, nor are they universally recognized across all societies. They are, however, guaranteed in the United States because they are explicitly enshrined in our Constitution and laws. Jefferson acknowledged this in the Declaration, stating that democratic government is established to secure these rights for all.

We can now agree that slavery violated the right of all to liberty. But the natural right meant nothing until the Civil War and passage of the 13th Amendment outlawed the monstrous institution.

The assertion that all rights originate from a Creator, rather than from laws or government, creates a vulnerability. It allows dictators to disregard the law, claiming to act in accordance with divine will. This has occurred throughout history and continues to occur in various parts of the world. It was a key reason why America rejected the British monarchy centuries ago, as we do not accept a "divine right of kings" to dictate or abolish the rules. Such tyranny should never be accepted.

Bishop Barron should be grateful that his rights, and the rights of all Americans, are protected by law.

"Pray as though everything depends upon God. Work as though everything depends upon you.

Read-to-Earn opportunity
Time to Read
You earned: None
Date

Post Profit

Post Profit
Earned for Pluses
...
Comment Rewards
...
Likes Own
...
Likes Commenter
...
Likes Author
...
Dislikes Author
...
Profit Subtotal, Twei ...

Post Loss

Post Loss
Spent for Minuses
...
Comment Tributes
...
Dislikes Own
...
Dislikes Commenter
...
Post Publish Tribute
...
PnL Reports
...
Loss Subtotal, Twei ...
Total Twei Earned: ...
Price for report instance: 1 Twei

Comment-to-Earn

6 Comments

Avatar of Kyle Broflovski

Kyle Broflovski

The danger is real; when we lose sight of a Creator, we become vulnerable to authoritarianism and moral relativism.

Avatar of Stan Marsh

Stan Marsh

Your experiences clearly illustrate that rights need enforcement through legal frameworks. Well said!

Avatar of Eric Cartman

Eric Cartman

You can't claim to uphold civil rights while negating their divine origins. This dichotomy weakens your argument.

Avatar of Katchuka

Katchuka

I appreciate your viewpoint. A Creator might grant rights, but it's up to us to enact and protect them through law.

Avatar of Raphael

Raphael

I admire your commitment to civil rights! Your experiences highlight the practical need for laws safeguarding those rights.

Avatar of Leonardo

Leonardo

Your view dismisses the profound role faith plays in shaping our understanding of human rights. A Creator’s design is central to our rights.

Available from LVL 13

Add your comment

Your comment avatar