National Guard Deployment and Federal Police Control Sparks Backlash

The Independent is committed to covering significant stories as they unfold, from reproductive rights and climate change to the influence of major technology companies. Our reporting includes in-depth investigations, such as examining the financial activities of political action committees and producing documentaries that shed light on critical issues. We strive to provide accurate information, separating facts from rhetoric, especially during pivotal moments in American history.

We understand the importance of having reporters on the ground to gather information and present both sides of the story. Our reporting is trusted by a diverse audience across the political spectrum. We believe in making quality journalism accessible to everyone, and we do not use paywalls to restrict access to our content.

Recently, former President Donald Trump announced plans to deploy members of the National Guard in Washington, D.C., and take control of the city's police force. This decision was made in response to what the president described as an escalating crime problem, despite data indicating a recent decrease in crime rates.

Trump stated that the deployment of Guardsmen would help "re-establish Law Order of public safety." He invoked a section of the District of Columbia Home Rule Act to federalize law enforcement in the city, placing the Metropolitan Police Department under federal control.

The president's decision has faced significant criticism. Reverend Al Sharpton called it an affront to justice and civil rights. Hillary Clinton noted that violent crime in D.C. is at a 30-year low. Nancy Pelosi accused the president of attempting to divert attention from other issues. Mayor Muriel Bowser described the administration's plans as "unsettling and unprecedented" and argued that it supports the case for her district being granted statehood.