Activist Naomi Finseth took a stand against the political status quo by signing her name 250 times on nomination forms as part of a protest organized by the Longest Ballot Committee. Along with her husband, Nathan Sereda, they gathered at a neighbor's house in Camrose, Alberta, to contribute to a campaign intended to highlight the absurdity of a by-election where a well-established party, represented by Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre, was poised to assert its influence again.
Their motivation stemmed from frustration over the need for yet another election just months after Conservative MP Damien Kurek’s sweeping victory with 82 percent of the vote. With Kurek resigning to allow Poilievre's return to the House of Commons, Finseth expressed her belief that the electoral process was flawed and needed reform—emphasizing that repeating a by-election for the same party felt unnecessary and frustrating.
The Longest Ballot Committee is pushing the envelope in protest by registering a record 214 candidates, most of whom are affiliated with the group, advocating for changes in the electoral framework. The sheer volume of candidates led to Elections Canada implementing a write-in ballot system, which allows voters to manually input their preferred choice rather than selecting from a printed list. This move has drawn sharp criticism from political figures including Poilievre, who labeled the group’s actions a “scam” and is advocating for legal changes to shut down such protests.
they view the system as inherently flawed and support calling for reforms. Organizers like Tomas Szuchewycz are rallying volunteers to help candidates meet nomination requirements by gathering necessary signatures from local residents.
Several participants shared their thoughts on the initiative, with some seeing it as an important opportunity for citizens to express their discontent with current political practices. Yet there are reservations, especially among seniors, about the potential complications arising from longer ballots. Participants like Ceilidh Stewart argue for changes that would mandate candidates to have local ties to the constituencies they seek to represent, adding weight to the call for a more accountable electoral process.
Overall, the initiatives of the Longest Ballot Committee and the sentiments expressed by its members reflect a growing dissatisfaction with elective practices, advocating for independent reform to secure a fairer representation of public interests in the political arena.
5 Comments
Rotfront
Elections already happen, so what is this protest for?
Karamba
This is a vital message! Hopefully things will change and people will see the flaws.
Matzomaster
The protest helps raise awareness about the need for electoral reform.
BuggaBoom
The Longest Ballot Committee is playing a childish game and making a mockery of our electoral system.
Loubianka
The intention of this political protest isn't to improve the conditions, but to make a point.