This week on Capitol Hill, the focus of attention is not the House Speaker, but the late Jeffrey Epstein. House Speaker Mike Johnson faced questions regarding his decision to oppose efforts from Democrats and some Republicans to compel the White House to release information about Epstein.
Johnson stated that the decision to oppose these motions was discussed during the weekly conference meeting, citing the Democrats' efforts to politicize the Epstein controversy. As a result of these motions, Republicans decided to shut down the House Rules Committee, which has significantly impacted the House floor's proceedings before a planned six-week recess. Leadership also informed members that the recess would begin a day earlier than scheduled, likely due to the Epstein situation.
Johnson emphasized the need for maximum transparency while also protecting innocent victims. He acknowledged the evil associated with Epstein's actions and the presence of innocent victims, including minors. He stressed the importance of carefully handling the release of Epstein's records to the public to protect those who were harmed.
When asked about the possibility of the House Judiciary and Oversight committees calling in Epstein's accomplices to testify, Johnson expressed openness to the idea. He indicated that these committees might take action and that they would be given time to conduct their work.
Representative Tim Burchett of Tennessee is actively working to make this happen. He put forward a motion in the House Oversight Committee directing its chairman to subpoena Ghislaine Maxwell, Epstein's longtime associate, who was convicted of sex trafficking involvement. The committee approved the motion, and they will collaborate with the Department of Justice and the Bureau of Prisons to schedule a deposition with Maxwell.
Burchett expressed his frustration with the delays and his desire to move forward with the investigation. He also supports legislation aimed at compelling the Department of Justice to release Epstein's files. He cautioned against a witch hunt against individuals who interacted with Epstein but were not involved in his crimes, emphasizing the need for a judicious approach.
5 Comments
Muchacha
He's doing what he can within the confines of his role. It’s easy to criticize without understanding the complexities of the situation.
Bella Ciao
It's the details that matter and I think that so far, the details seem reasonable.
Fuerza
If Johnson truly cared about the victims, he would be pushing for the earliest possible release of all relevant information, not delaying it.
Ongania
This sounds like a cover-up more than an investigation. Johnson is protecting powerful interests!
Manolo Noriega
Johnson is acting responsibly. Let’s not jump to conclusions before all the cards are on the table.