During a dinner with Republican lawmakers at the White House, President Donald Trump addressed the recent hostilities between India and Pakistan, indicating that up to five jets were shot down amidst ongoing conflicts ignited by a militant attack in India-administered Kashmir in April. He did not clarify whether the destroyed aircraft belonged to India or Pakistan, simply stating, "In fact, planes were being shot out of the air."
Trump’s remarks echo claims made by Pakistan, which stated it had downed five Indian planes during air engagements. Conversely, India's top military leader reported that after initial losses, India adapted its approach and gained an advantage before the ceasefire was enacted three days later. India has also asserted it shot down several Pakistani aircraft, while Pakistan denied any loss of planes but confirmed damage to its air bases.
The President has consistently credited himself for the ceasefire announced on May 10, following diplomatic discussions with both nations. However, India's stance is that issues between the two should be resolved without outside interference, differing from Trump's narrative. As India becomes a more significant ally for the U.S. in countering Chinese influence, Pakistan remains an important partner as well.
The conflict was exacerbated by an April attack that resulted in 26 fatalities in Kashmir, leading to heightened military exchanges involving airstrikes and artillery, which caused numerous casualties until the recent ceasefire was established.
5 Comments
Loubianka
Five jets shot down"? He's just throwing out numbers without any evidence. This is irresponsible behavior.
BuggaBoom
Maybe Trump's involvement helped secure the ceasefire. We should wait to see the details.
Loubianka
Why is Trump weighing in on international conflicts when he clearly doesn't understand the details of the situation?
Michelangelo
It is not the President's place to interject between to rival countries at a moment like this.
Africa
This is a classic example of Trump's misinformation. He doesn't back up his statements with facts, just vague pronouncements.