The plans put forward by Thames Water to release treated wastewater into the Thames have faced considerable backlash from local residents, who are apprehensive about the implications for water quality and the environment. The project, known as the Teddington Direct River Abstraction project, is part of the River Thames Scheme designed to ensure London has an adequate water supply, anticipating a need for an additional one billion litres of water daily by 2050 due to population growth and climate change challenges. The construction of two new pipes near Teddington Lock, a recreation hotspot, has raised alarms, especially as the proposals went through public consultation last month where locals voiced their concerns.
Worries center around the potential negative consequences that the new infrastructure could have on the area's water quality. Recent criticisms include remarks from Lee Greed, manager of the Royal British Legion Teddington club, who emphasized the historical significance of the river for local veterans and called for the preservation of its integrity. Additionally, local leaders, such as Teddington councillor Richard Baker, accused Thames Water of opting for the most cost-effective solution without being mindful of the community’s perspectives on pollution and the visual landscape. Dianne Yarlett, a local business owner, expressed deep concern that the project could endanger the quality of water they have relied on, while Thames Water asserts that the treated water would meet high standards to preserve the river's health.
Opposition is further galvanizing through the Save our Lands and River campaign (SOLAR), with many locals uniting against the pipeline proposal. The group's marketing manager voiced the sentiment that efforts should be directed toward cleaning rivers rather than potentially compromising their purity. Demonstrations and public meetings have been organized, drawing significant community participation, including local politicians. Nonetheless, there are voices of support for water recycling efforts, with some residents advocating for the benefits of the proposed scheme. Thames Water officials have assured that the project aims to deliver safe and environmentally compliant water, emphasizing their commitment to community engagement throughout the process.
10 Comments
Muchacho
The veterans deserve better. This plan disrespects their connection to the Thames.
Coccinella
The future is water recycling. We have to be realistic about water conservation and how to meet the growing needs of the population.
ZmeeLove
So, "cost-effective" means polluting our drinking water? Not on my watch!
Habibi
We need to be realistic about the future. This project addresses a pressing water shortage.
Muchacha
Thames Water is addressing a growing water problem. I'm glad they are finally taking action!
Eugene Alta
We MUST hold Thames Water accountable! They are prioritizing profit over our community.
Loubianka
This is a disgrace! Rivers should be cleaned, not used as a dumping ground for treated wastewater.
Eugene Alta
Look at this view! Then imagine sewage.... This is wrong. We need clean rivers, not recycled waste.
Noir Black
(Twitter) Thames Water is making a dangerous decision. The risk to our health, wildlife, and enjoyment of the river is too great.
BuggaBoom
This project demonstrates a commitment to adapting to climate change and population growth. Good job