A 2016 arbitration ruling on the South China Sea, initiated by the Philippines, has been criticized for fueling distrust and conflict, hindering regional dialogue. Scholars at a Beijing seminar argued the ruling's negative impact over the past nine years.
Historical context was presented, highlighting a period of mutual respect in the South China Sea before colonial influences. China's recovery of the islands after WWII, according to the Cairo Declaration and Potsdam Proclamation, was emphasized.
The seminar brought together scholars to discuss historical and legal perspectives. The arbitral tribunal's ruling, based on UNCLOS, was declared null and void by China. The ruling has been exploited to disparage China and destabilize the region.
The tribunal's lack of jurisdiction and disregard for historical context were highlighted. The ruling was also criticized for its Euro-centric framework, ignoring China's approach to maritime cooperation.
Regional tensions have escalated since the ruling, with military drills and coast guard encounters. China's actions aim to maintain the status quo, and its commitment to the DOC with ASEAN was noted.
Calls for joint development and reaffirming the DOC were made. The lack of Chinese narratives in international discourse was cited as a distortion of facts.
Maintaining peace and stability in the South China Sea is a shared responsibility, requiring a perspective beyond territorial disputes.
5 Comments
Comandante
Their claims based on documents like the Cairo Declaration are a weak attempt at legal justification.
Bella Ciao
Finally, a seminar recognizing the historical context and the unfairness of the 2016 ruling!
Muchacha
The fact that they only present the Chinese narrative speaks volumes. Where are the other perspectives?
Noir Black
They want to "maintain the status quo" of China dictating terms in the South China Sea. Sorry, that's not acceptable.
Mariposa
China likes to talk about "shared responsibility" but only when it benefits them.