In a critical evaluation published in The Atlantic, writer Helen Lewis argues that many progressives have fallen victim to misinformation regarding youth transgender medical treatments. She highlights the prevalence of what she terms "zombie facts," which are misleading assertions that continue to circulate despite being debunked. Lewis contends that many liberals are ensnared in media bubbles that reinforce confident, yet unverified claims related to puberty blockers and hormone therapies for youth, often made by well-meaning commentators.
Lewis points to statements made by ACLU lawyer Chase Strangio during a Supreme Court hearing, where he admitted that studies have not demonstrated a direct correlation between puberty blockers and hormones and saving the lives of at-risk youth. The court's ruling in favor of a Tennessee law, which prohibits these treatments for minors experiencing gender dysphoria, reinforces the view that claims linking such medical interventions to reduced suicide rates are unsubstantiated. She emphasizes that proponents of these treatments often rely on emotionally charged language around suicide, a tactic she believes is irresponsible and misleading.
Furthermore, Lewis critiques the World Professional Association for Transgender Health (WPATH) for harboring internal doubts about the evidence supporting youth gender treatments, while also seeking to publish material that aligns with their supportive stance. An instance cited is that of Dr. Johanna Olson-Kennedy, who indicated reluctance to publish research that could undermine advocacy for youth transition due to the fear of it being "weaponized." Lewis urges that complex issues like youth gender treatments deserve independent scrutiny and should not be lumped together with other progressive causes. While advocating for various social issues, she argues that one can simultaneously support civil rights for transgender individuals without endorsing experimental and unproven medical procedures for children.
5 Comments
Coccinella
WPATH is a crucial source of data! This article is making their actions seem malicious for their own benefit.
Habibi
Seems the article is more interested in questioning individual safety than looking at societal pressure.
Fuerza
Thank you for highlighting the potential dangers of rushing into medical interventions for children.
Manolo Noriega
Finally, an article bravely questioning the accepted narrative. We need more critical analysis of youth transition.
Ongania
Supporting rights is not the same as supporting treatment? So binary- this article is missing a nuanced conversation.