Covid-19

WHO Concludes Investigation into COVID-19 Origins with Uncertain Outcomes

The World Health Organization (WHO) stated on June 27 that all theories concerning how the COVID-19 pandemic originated are still being considered, following a protracted investigation that faced significant challenges due to the withholding of vital information. The pandemic, which the WHO estimates to have resulted in around 20 million deaths, has greatly affected global economies, health systems, and everyday lives since the first cases emerged in Wuhan, China, in late 2019.

WHO Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus clarified that, at present, all possible explanations—such as zoonotic spillover from animals or a laboratory accident—are still under review. The organization's initial collaborative report with China in March 2021 suggested that the virus most likely made the jump from bats to humans through an intermediary species, labeling the idea of a lab leak from Wuhan's virology lab as "extremely unlikely". However, this assessment drew significant backlash for its perceived lack of transparency and thorough investigation into the lab-leak theory.

In response to mounting criticism, Tedros initiated a new investigation in July 2021, forming the Scientific Advisory Group for the Origins of Novel Pathogens (SAGO), comprising 27 global experts. Their recent 78-page report indicates that evidence weighs more heavily in favor of animal spillover, whether directly from bats or through another host, yet it stops short of determining the precise time and location of this event or confirming if the Wuhan wet market was the initial site of human transmission.

While the report supports the theory of an animal spillover based on current evidence, the chair of SAGO, Marietjie Venter, stressed the ongoing uncertainty due to insufficient information that has not yet been provided by various nations, including Germany and the United States. In an additional note of contention, earlier this week, one SAGO member resigned, and three others requested their names be removed from the investigation report.

Read-to-Earn opportunity
Time to Read
You earned: None
Date

Post Profit

Post Profit
Earned for Pluses
...
Comment Rewards
...
Likes Own
...
Likes Commenter
...
Likes Author
...
Dislikes Author
...
Profit Subtotal, Twei ...

Post Loss

Post Loss
Spent for Minuses
...
Comment Tributes
...
Dislikes Own
...
Dislikes Commenter
...
Post Publish Tribute
...
PnL Reports
...
Loss Subtotal, Twei ...
Total Twei Earned: ...
Price for report instance: 1 Twei

Comment-to-Earn

5 Comments

Avatar of dedus mopedus

dedus mopedus

These are serious matters that need constant attention. We've done better at that and keeping everyone informed.

Avatar of ytkonos

ytkonos

Resignations and name removals? Sounds like internal conflict and people trying to distance themselves.

Avatar of lettlelenok

lettlelenok

Mounting criticism is the only thing that seems to prompt them to even pretend to look into this.

Avatar of Mariposa

Mariposa

The focus needs to be on finding the truth, not assigning blame. This is something we can strive for together.

Avatar of ZmeeLove

ZmeeLove

Skepticism is healthy, but let's also consider the complexity of this investigation.

Available from LVL 13

Add your comment

Your comment avatar