Two prominent online staffing agencies have prohibited requests for workers to produce political videos. This decision stems from concerns that such activities could potentially violate the Public Offices Election Law.
The Public Offices Election Law prohibits the payment of money to individuals involved in election-related activities. The online requests, which offered compensation for creating short videos, were seen as potentially constituting vote-buying. These videos gained significant attention during the Hyogo and Tokyo gubernatorial elections last year, raising concerns about their influence on the election outcomes.
The two companies involved are CrowdWorks Inc. and coconala inc., both based in Tokyo. These short political videos typically involve editing and combining clips from campaign speeches and news conferences, along with added titles and information, for distribution on social media platforms and YouTube. Some individuals have used these videos as a means to generate income through advertising revenue based on the number of views.
CrowdWorks updated its guidelines on March 14. While the previous guidelines already prohibited activities that could violate laws, the new version specifically includes political activities. A company representative explained that the distinction between election and political activities had become increasingly difficult to define. The company has already removed several requests seeking individuals to create these short political videos.
Coconala previously banned activities that provided information, including political ideologies. The company is now implementing a clearer definition due to encountering job requests that could potentially violate the Public Offices Election Law. A specialized team will be established to remove or issue warnings about job requests that are deemed to be attempts to negatively or positively influence the political image of specific office holders, candidates, or political parties.
Another major online job brokering company, Lancers Inc., already prohibits requests for workers to handle any election-related tasks. The company declined to confirm whether any new guidelines would be added.
Masahito Tadano, a constitutional law professor at Hitotsubashi University in Tokyo, suggests that the actions taken by the two companies could have an impact in the coming months, particularly with the upcoming Tokyo metropolitan assembly election in June and the Upper House election scheduled for July.
10 Comments
Loubianka
So, if I get paid for making a video criticizing a politician, I'm breaking the law? Seems like a serious overreach.
BuggaBoom
The law needed to be changed to address this new kind of vote buying (with an internet twist). Good on the companies for stepping up.
Katchuka
Well done for CrowdWorks and Coconala for taking things seriously and removing any doubt about their intentions and activities.
KittyKat
The intent of the videos is clearly to influence. I don't mind the idea of freedom of speech, but the intent to buy votes should be illegal.
Noir Black
This is a win for those who are already in power, and they will be hard to unseat
BuggaBoom
This is a slippery slope. Where does it end? Can you eventually no longer talk about politics if you're paid?
Matzomaster
If the videos are factual, why should they be prohibited? Seems like a way to protect incumbents.
Katchuka
Who decides what constitutes an attempt to 'negatively influence'? This gives too much power to the companies.
Eugene Alta
This is a crucial step towards preventing unfair influence in the upcoming elections. The integrity of our democratic processes is paramount.
Loubianka
The potential for corruption is high, but this law doesn't go far enough to prevent real and meaningful corruption.