Elections

Online Staffing Agencies Ban Political Video Requests Amid Election Law Concerns

Two prominent online staffing agencies have prohibited requests for workers to produce political videos. This decision stems from concerns that such activities could potentially violate the Public Offices Election Law.

The Public Offices Election Law prohibits the payment of money to individuals involved in election-related activities. The online requests, which offered compensation for creating short videos, were seen as potentially constituting vote-buying. These videos gained significant attention during the Hyogo and Tokyo gubernatorial elections last year, raising concerns about their influence on the election outcomes.

The two companies involved are CrowdWorks Inc. and coconala inc., both based in Tokyo. These short political videos typically involve editing and combining clips from campaign speeches and news conferences, along with added titles and information, for distribution on social media platforms and YouTube. Some individuals have used these videos as a means to generate income through advertising revenue based on the number of views.

CrowdWorks updated its guidelines on March 14. While the previous guidelines already prohibited activities that could violate laws, the new version specifically includes political activities. A company representative explained that the distinction between election and political activities had become increasingly difficult to define. The company has already removed several requests seeking individuals to create these short political videos.

Coconala previously banned activities that provided information, including political ideologies. The company is now implementing a clearer definition due to encountering job requests that could potentially violate the Public Offices Election Law. A specialized team will be established to remove or issue warnings about job requests that are deemed to be attempts to negatively or positively influence the political image of specific office holders, candidates, or political parties.

Another major online job brokering company, Lancers Inc., already prohibits requests for workers to handle any election-related tasks. The company declined to confirm whether any new guidelines would be added.

Masahito Tadano, a constitutional law professor at Hitotsubashi University in Tokyo, suggests that the actions taken by the two companies could have an impact in the coming months, particularly with the upcoming Tokyo metropolitan assembly election in June and the Upper House election scheduled for July.

Read-to-Earn opportunity
Time to Read
You earned: None
Date

Post Profit

Post Profit
Earned for Pluses
...
Comment Rewards
...
Likes Own
...
Likes Commenter
...
Likes Author
...
Dislikes Author
...
Profit Subtotal, Twei ...

Post Loss

Post Loss
Spent for Minuses
...
Comment Tributes
...
Dislikes Own
...
Dislikes Commenter
...
Post Publish Tribute
...
PnL Reports
...
Loss Subtotal, Twei ...
Total Twei Earned: ...
Price for report instance: 1 Twei

Comment-to-Earn

10 Comments

Avatar of Loubianka

Loubianka

So, if I get paid for making a video criticizing a politician, I'm breaking the law? Seems like a serious overreach.

Avatar of BuggaBoom

BuggaBoom

The law needed to be changed to address this new kind of vote buying (with an internet twist). Good on the companies for stepping up.

Avatar of Katchuka

Katchuka

Well done for CrowdWorks and Coconala for taking things seriously and removing any doubt about their intentions and activities.

Avatar of KittyKat

KittyKat

The intent of the videos is clearly to influence. I don't mind the idea of freedom of speech, but the intent to buy votes should be illegal.

Avatar of Noir Black

Noir Black

This is a win for those who are already in power, and they will be hard to unseat

Avatar of BuggaBoom

BuggaBoom

This is a slippery slope. Where does it end? Can you eventually no longer talk about politics if you're paid?

Avatar of Matzomaster

Matzomaster

If the videos are factual, why should they be prohibited? Seems like a way to protect incumbents.

Avatar of Katchuka

Katchuka

Who decides what constitutes an attempt to 'negatively influence'? This gives too much power to the companies.

Avatar of Eugene Alta

Eugene Alta

This is a crucial step towards preventing unfair influence in the upcoming elections. The integrity of our democratic processes is paramount.

Avatar of Loubianka

Loubianka

The potential for corruption is high, but this law doesn't go far enough to prevent real and meaningful corruption.

Available from LVL 13

Add your comment

Your comment avatar