A Record-Breaking Start and Constitutional Concerns

As Donald Trump approached the end of his first 100 days in office, he had issued an unusually high number of executive orders, totaling 124. Simultaneously, he had signed a historically low number of new bills into law, with only five enacted. This pattern raised concerns among constitutional scholars.

Experts noted the extraordinary scope and volume of these executive orders, suggesting a potential challenge to the rule of law. Some observed that the orders were encroaching on areas typically governed by individual states. Trump's approach involved governing through his signature, focusing on areas like immigration, tariffs, and education. He appeared to be reshaping the nation with minimal resistance.

The low number of bills signed into law was unprecedented in recent presidential history. Trump's tally of five bills was significantly lower than that of previous presidents at the same point in their terms. In contrast, he had issued a substantial number of executive orders, approaching the totals of some predecessors over their entire terms.

Executive orders, which do not require Congressional approval, allow the president to direct government actions. However, they are subject to legal challenges. Trump's executive orders have already faced numerous lawsuits, questioning their constitutionality and the extent of their use.

Critics have argued that the high volume of executive orders represents an overreach of presidential power. Some have pointed to specific instances where these orders have been challenged in court, including those related to birthright citizenship, diversity programs, and actions against specific entities. These actions have prompted accusations of unconstitutional behavior and a potential abuse of power.