The Department of Justice wants to represent Donald Trump in his appeal of a defamation case brought by E. Jean Carroll, potentially saving him tens of millions of dollars. The DOJ believes the Westfall Act protects Trump, who was found liable for defaming Carroll after denying her sexual abuse claims.
The DOJ argues Trump was acting as president when he made the statements, entitling him to immunity. Legal experts debate whether his actions were within the scope of his duties. The Westfall Act allows federal employees immunity for actions within their employment.
Trump denied Carroll's allegations, calling her claims false. The DOJ initially supported Trump, then reversed course, citing the personal nature of the alleged assault. Now, under Trump's purview, the DOJ has reversed again, arguing his actions were within his official capacity.
Legal experts see this as consistent with Trump's approach to the DOJ. Carroll's lawyer argues the Supreme Court's immunity ruling doesn't apply.
8 Comments
Marishka
This shows that even if we may not agree with Trump, there are legal protections that should be observed for the office of the presidency.
Pupsik
We need to define what a president can say while in office. This case could set an important precedent for future leaders.
Marishka
I'm glad the DOJ is backing Trump here. It's essential to ensure that presidential duties are respected, even in controversial cases.
Pupsik
This is an important case for clarifying the limits of presidential immunity. It's not uncommon for officials to have some protection when acting in their capacity.
Marishka
It makes sense for the DOJ to step in. If Trump was acting as president when he made those statements, he should have protection under the Westfall Act.
Leonardo
Glad to see the DOJ taking a stand for presidential immunity. This is about upholding the institution of the presidency.
Michelangelo
What happened to the rule of law? Just because Trump was president does not mean he can say whatever he wants without consequences.
Donatello
I think it's smart for the DOJ to argue that Trump was acting within his official role. It helps draw a line in the sand for future administrations.