Jordan Belfort, famously known as the 'Wolf of Wall Street,' has recently weighed in on the controversy surrounding President Donald Trump’s tariff policy and its potential implications for market manipulation. Following Trump’s announcement of a temporary halt on global tariffs, Belfort voiced his belief during an interview with Sky News that the president’s actions do not constitute illegal practices. He pointed out that if Trump had privately advised select individuals to invest, that would be a different case; however, since Trump made his comments in a public forum, he does not find them suspicious.

Belfort noted that Trump had previously encouraged buying shares, suggesting that his latest statements were consistent with this ongoing advice. He remarked that such guidance is considered common knowledge in investing circles, especially during market downturns. The market experienced a dramatic decline after Trump’s initial tariffs were implemented, but the ensuing announcement of a pause resulted in a historic rally, adding significant value to U.S. stocks.

While Democrats have raised ethical questions regarding the timeline of Trump’s statements and the possible implications for insider trading, the White House defended the president's communications as essential for restoring market confidence amid negative media coverage. Experts have cautioned about the ongoing volatility in the stock market as U.S.-China trade tensions continue, despite the rally that followed Trump's tariff pause.

Belfort expressed that while he does not generally support tariffs, he believes they were necessary to address what he perceives as a significant trade imbalance that has harmed the U.S. economy. He anticipates that, while there will be challenges ahead, particularly for consumers reliant on Chinese imports, companies may adapt by relocating their production outside of China to mitigate the impact of tariffs. Additionally, Belfort shared his endorsement of Elon Musk's ambitious initiatives aimed at reducing government inefficiencies, citing the prevalence of waste and fraud as justification for such reforms.