Attorneys representing Mahmoud Khalil, an anti-Israel protester, have voiced their concerns about a two-page letter issued by Secretary of State Marco Rubio. They argue that the allegations outlined in the letter, which were presented in immigration court, lack sufficient evidence. The Trump administration contends that it holds the power to deport noncitizens whose activities may harm U.S. foreign policy interests. Khalil, who is a legal permanent resident and a graduate student at Columbia University, is accused of engaging in "antisemitic protests" and disruptive behaviors during significant demonstrations. The administration has claimed that his presence could lead to "serious adverse foreign consequences."

Khalil's legal representative, Marc Van Der Hout, emphasized the brevity of the letter, suggesting that it is inadequate in supporting the government's stance. He criticized the administration for attempting to suppress Khalil's voice and the voices of those who protest against the actions of the Israeli and U.S. governments. A federal judge, Jamee Comans, is set to make a ruling on whether Khalil will be deported or released, a decision that could have significant implications regarding constitutional rights and the government's authority to act in such matters.

The attorneys have also accused the Trump administration of seeking to manipulate jurisdiction to favor its case against Khalil in a more accommodating court. They claim that the government is trying to present its case in immigration court, where the judges are expected to defer to the Secretary of State's assertions regarding Khalil being a threat without substantial proofs. This argument further highlights concerns about the administration's tactics in handling the case. Khalil was apprehended by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement on March 8, and following his detention, his green card was revoked by Rubio. Khalil has publicly denounced his arrest as reflective of anti-Palestinian racism.