Laws and Justice

Colombian Court Rules J Balvin and Karol G Song Violated Children's Rights

A Colombian high court has issued a ruling concerning the song "+57," a collaboration between J Balvin and Karol G. The court determined that the song's lyrics violated the rights of children due to their perceived sexualization of minors.

The 14-page ruling mandates that Karol G, J Balvin, and other artists involved in the song's creation refrain from releasing music that infringes upon the rights of children and adolescents. The court emphasized that sexualizing minors reduces them to objects of desire and exposes them to developmental risks.

Upon its release in November, "+57" generated controversy in Colombia, prompting immediate demands for its removal from child rights organizations. The song also received negative reviews from music critics.

The song, named after Colombia’s telephone country code, depicts a young woman partying despite having a partner. The lyrics describe her as having been a "hot mama" from a young age and entering a disco to drink shots.

Following the criticism, Karol G, whose real name is Carolina Giraldo, issued an apology on her Instagram account, stating that the lyrics had been "taken out of context" while acknowledging a need for personal growth. J Balvin, whose real name is Jose Alvaro Osorio, also issued an apology.

In response to the criticism, a revised version of "+57" was released on YouTube, altering the lyrics to describe the woman as having been a "hot mama" from the age of 18.

The song was recorded in Medellin, Karol G's hometown. The city has gained fame for producing several prominent reggaeton singers. Medellin has also faced challenges in protecting minors from sexual predators.

Read-to-Earn opportunity
Time to Read
You earned: None
Date

Post Profit

Post Profit
Earned for Pluses
...
Comment Rewards
...
Likes Own
...
Likes Commenter
...
Likes Author
...
Dislikes Author
...
Profit Subtotal, Twei ...

Post Loss

Post Loss
Spent for Minuses
...
Comment Tributes
...
Dislikes Own
...
Dislikes Commenter
...
Post Publish Tribute
...
PnL Reports
...
Loss Subtotal, Twei ...
Total Twei Earned: ...
Price for report instance: 1 Twei

Comment-to-Earn

8 Comments

Avatar of Habibi

Habibi

Finally, someone is holding artists accountable for their lyrics. Children deserve protection.

Avatar of Muchacho

Muchacho

Karol G and J Balvin apologized; isn't that enough? This is just an example of cancel culture gone too far.

Avatar of Rotfront

Rotfront

Next, they’ll be telling us what movies we can watch. This is the slippery slope of censorship!

Avatar of Matzomaster

Matzomaster

If you don’t like the lyrics, don’t listen! Why ruin it for everyone else?

Avatar of Karamba

Karamba

It's about time that artists realized the consequences of their words; this ruling sets a precedent.

Avatar of Muchacho

Muchacho

The song sparked conversation; isn’t that what art is for? This is just stifling creativity.

Avatar of Bella Ciao

Bella Ciao

This ruling is an overreach! Artists should be free to express themselves without censorship.

Avatar of Coccinella

Coccinella

So the court thinks they can dictate what musicians can or cannot say? Where does this end?

Available from LVL 13

Add your comment

Your comment avatar