Laws and Justice

China Sees First Decline in Court Verdict Non-Compliance in a Decade

The Supreme People's Court of China announced on Monday that the number of individuals and organizations failing to comply with court verdicts decreased in 2024, marking the first decline in a decade. This positive trend reflects the courts' increased focus on enforcing rulings nationwide.

China has implemented a reform initiative aimed at improving the efficiency of handling significant, complex cases and long-unresolved verdicts. This reform strengthens judicial oversight and encourages collaboration between courts. The goal is to protect the rights of those involved in legal proceedings and to enhance the credibility of the judicial system.

The reform, initiated a year and a half ago, has yielded notable results. By the end of March, nearly 300,000 cases had been resolved, with approximately 160 billion yuan ($22.6 billion) enforced.

Those who fail to adhere to court rulings, such as debtors who do not fulfill their obligations, are added to a public "dishonest list." This list includes their names and identification details. The purpose of this measure is to encourage compliance with court decisions and to support China's social credit system.

The court reported that the number of individuals restoring their credit by complying with verdicts has exceeded the number of new additions to the dishonest list. This trend is seen as a positive factor in stimulating market activity and fostering stable economic growth.

In the first quarter of 2024, the number of new entries on the dishonest list decreased by 9 percent compared to the same period the previous year. The court is also emphasizing the importance of judges maintaining proper conduct when enforcing rulings to ensure the quality of enforcement.

Over the past ten years, China has been strengthening its credit system. In 2024, the Supreme People's Court and the Supreme People's Procuratorate issued a judicial interpretation clarifying criminal penalties for those who refuse to comply with court rulings. This is intended to better protect the rights of those who win lawsuits.

Read-to-Earn opportunity
Time to Read
You earned: None
Date

Post Profit

Post Profit
Earned for Pluses
...
Comment Rewards
...
Likes Own
...
Likes Commenter
...
Likes Author
...
Dislikes Author
...
Profit Subtotal, Twei ...

Post Loss

Post Loss
Spent for Minuses
...
Comment Tributes
...
Dislikes Own
...
Dislikes Commenter
...
Post Publish Tribute
...
PnL Reports
...
Loss Subtotal, Twei ...
Total Twei Earned: ...
Price for report instance: 1 Twei

Comment-to-Earn

6 Comments

Avatar of Mariposa

Mariposa

How is the public 'dishonest list' protecting individuals' privacy and data security?

Avatar of Bella Ciao

Bella Ciao

Is the increased efficiency coming at the cost of due process? Are people getting a fair chance to be heard?

Avatar of Bermudez

Bermudez

The judicial interpretation clarification for criminal penalties doesn't guarantee fairness and accuracy in judgment, only strengthens pressure.

Avatar of Africa

Africa

This crackdown on non-compliance might be focused on simpler cases, while powerful individuals could still get away with something.

Avatar of Bella Ciao

Bella Ciao

The report doesn't state what is the amount of uncollected funds related to non-adherence to court rulings.

Avatar of Bermudez

Bermudez

Without more details on the types of cases and the specific reforms, it's hard to see if these measures really improve judicial outcomes!

Available from LVL 13

Add your comment

Your comment avatar