A Crossroads for Independence and American Influence

A Crossroads for Independence and American Interest

Greenland's parliamentary elections on Tuesday, April 6th, 2021, were more than just a routine vote. With President Donald Trump's aggressive pursuit of acquiring the island and growing calls for independence from Denmark, the future of Greenland was at the forefront of voters' minds.

The 31 seats in Greenland's parliament, Inatsisartut, may seem like a small matter, but this election garnered global attention. "It's definitely a different election this time around," said Jon Rahbek-Clemmensen, an associate professor at the Royal Danish Defence College.

Previously, independence from Denmark was seen as a distant goal for future generations. However, Trump's interest has made it a tangible reality, forcing voters to consider what independence could look like, whether it be close collaboration with the US or even annexation.

While Greenland is the world's largest island, it is sparsely populated with just over 56,000 people. Controlled by Denmark for almost 300 years, it gained home rule in 1979, though Copenhagen still controls foreign and defense policy and contributes significantly to its economy.

Despite these benefits, Denmark has also profited from Greenland's resources and geopolitical advantage. Trump, however, has repeatedly expressed interest in acquiring the island, citing its strategic location, untapped resources, and existing American military base.

However, both Greenlandic and Danish politicians have repeatedly rejected Trump's overtures. Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen has ruled out transferring the territory, and Greenlanders themselves seem uninterested in becoming part of the US. A recent poll found that 85% of respondents did not wish to join the US, with nearly half seeing Trump's interest as a threat.

Greenland's parliament has even passed a law banning foreign contributions to political parties in a pre-emptive move to curb US interference.

Some parties, however, advocate for a swift transition to full independence, potentially with a defense agreement with the US. Others, like the dominant Siumut party, have previously called for an independence referendum before backtracking.

The results of the election will determine whether Greenland seeks to maintain the status quo within the Kingdom of Denmark, pursue greater autonomy, or forge a closer relationship with the US. The choice, as Rahbek-Clemmensen emphasizes, must be made now.