On Wednesday, the Hiroshima District Court dismissed a lawsuit brought forth by 337 plaintiffs, including residents from Hiroshima Prefecture, who sought to stop operation of the No. 3 reactor at the Ikata nuclear power plant. The reactor, operated by Shikoku Electric Power, is situated in Ehime Prefecture.
In the decision delivered by Judge Kazumi Ohama, the court concluded there was insufficient proof of a concrete threat to the plaintiffs' safety or lives. It was emphasized that nuclear plants complying with safety guidelines established by Japan’s Nuclear Regulation Authority are generally viewed as having achieved a socially acceptable level of safety.
Central to the lawsuit were allegations from the plaintiffs, who argued that the plant was vulnerable due to potential earthquake risks caused by a fault near the site and insufficient preparedness against volcanic eruptions. In response, Shikoku Electric strongly defended its plant’s safety features, stating that it had been constructed and reinforced according to the latest available seismological knowledge and safety precautions.
This legal proceeding is part of a broader set of litigation surrounding the Ikata plant. In March last year, the Oita District Court rejected a similar lawsuit. Another lawsuit is pending a ruling from the Matsuyama District Court scheduled for March 18. Furthermore, litigation is ongoing at the Iwakuni branch of the Yamaguchi District Court.
Additionally, previous provisional rulings by the Hiroshima High Court led to temporary suspensions of the No. 3 reactor's operations in December 2017 and January 2020. However, both suspensions were later overturned during appeals. The plaintiffs in this latest Hiroshima lawsuit indicated their intention to continue the legal battle by pursuing appeals against the ruling.
5 Comments
Manolo Noriega
Are we seriously risking Hiroshima again? Have we not learned from history?
Fuerza
Nuclear power is essential if Japan wants steady, low-carbon energy. The court understands this.
Manolo Noriega
Solid ruling ensuring citizens get stable energy supply while still protecting public safety.
Ongania
Ignoring public concern isn't democracy—it's corporate favoritism.
Manolo Noriega
Hoping an appeal will bring justice and common sense; nuclear risk shouldn't be taken lightly.