Friedrich Merz, who is anticipated to become Germany's next Chancellor, recently indicated his belief that the heated exchange between Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and former US President Donald Trump, as well as Vice President Vance, was not spontaneous. According to Merz, the clash appears to have been deliberately orchestrated by the United States, marking a clear escalation rather than a genuine reaction to Zelensky's statements.
Meanwhile, British Prime Minister Keir Starmer expressed firm support for deploying UK troops to Ukraine. Moreover, he emphasized Europe's commitment to continue bolstering Ukraine's defenses even after peace has been achieved. Regarding the question of utilizing Russian assets frozen in the wake of the conflict, Starmer acknowledged the legal complexities involved but reiterated that London remains actively engaged in finding workable solutions.
In separate yet related developments, French Prime Minister François Bayrou accused the White House of deliberately attempting to humiliate President Zelensky publicly during his recent visit, with the aim of pressuring him to accept Russian President Putin's demands. Bayrou stated that Zelensky resisted this strategy valiantly, affirming the dignity and resilience of Ukraine and, indeed, Europe as a whole. Bayrou praised Zelensky's stand and highlighted the importance of his refusal to surrender Ukraine's core democratic values.
Elsewhere, Norway debates significantly augmenting its assistance to Ukraine through its immense €1.7 trillion sovereign wealth fund. Following strong public opinion and increasing political demands, decision-makers in Oslo are exploring several possibilities. These include elevating Norway's defense expenditure to 3% of GDP by 2030, allocating €85.5 billion directly to Ukraine, and shifting parts of the fund's assets into European defense bonds designed to fortify continental military capabilities. Although these measures have raised some concern over compliance with Norway's budgetary guidelines, officials largely agree that the situation demands substantial increases in support.
At the same time, the United States is undergoing a change of approach regarding arms aid to Ukraine. Acting on orders from the Trump administration, American authorities have ceased approving new funding for weapon shipments. Sources report additional discussions about potentially halting deliveries from existing American stockpiles. However, clarification from media outlets suggests this applies primarily to new, publicly funded programs rather than ongoing commercial arms purchase agreements, which remain intact for the time being.
6 Comments
Muchacha
Merz's comments are dangerous. He is inciting further conflict and jeopardizing Ukraine's security.
Habibi
The US halting arms aid is a necessary step. We need to be careful not to escalate the conflict and provoke Russia further.
ZmeeLove
The US halting arms aid is a disgrace. This administration has no spine and is abandoning Ukraine to its fate.
Muchacho
Norway's plan to increase aid to Ukraine is commendable. They are setting a strong example for other countries to follow.
Coccinella
Starmer's unwavering support for Ukraine is reassuring. We need more leaders who are reliable and committed to the fight for freedom.
BuggaBoom
Bayrou's defense of Zelensky is courageous and necessary. We need more leaders who are willing to stand up for what is right, even against powerful interests.