Malaysian Anti-Corruption Agency Denies Selective Prosecution Amid Journalist's Arrest

The Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) recently reaffirmed its stance on impartial enforcement amid criticism over its arrest of a journalist. Speaking on Sunday, MACC Chief Commissioner Azam Baki countered claims of selective prosecution, stating that corruption investigations would target anyone involved regardless of their profession or societal status, including politicians and journalists.

The controversy emerged after authorities apprehended journalist B Nantha Kumar from online news portal Malaysiakini at a hotel in Shah Alam. Authorities allege he solicited a bribe of RM20,000 (approximately US$4,482) from an agent responsible for supplying foreign workers. The journalist allegedly intended to suppress previously published articles and refrain from further reporting on a foreign worker agency reportedly operating a syndicate facilitating the entry of workers into Malaysia.

Azam Baki clarified the MACC’s stance by highlighting that solid evidence—including possession of RM20,000 in cash—supported their suspicions and subsequent actions against the journalist. He underscored that investigations were thorough and objective, refuting allegations of bias and selectivity in their prosecution practices.

Despite MACC's clarification, criticism arose from various political figures, notably PAS secretary-general Takiyuddin Hassan. Takiyuddin argued that MACC should prioritize investigating broader allegations of corruption involving immigration officials and agents at Malaysia's entry points, suggesting that detaining a journalist who reported such matters was unconventional and unjustified. He expressed the view that MACC's actions against the journalist raised questions about its priorities and approach to combating corruption.

Currently, journalist B Nantha Kumar remains in custody pending additional investigations. Local media indicates he was initially accused of demanding RM100,000, a figure allegedly reduced afterward to RM20,000. He faces prosecution under Section 16(a)(A) of the MACC Act 2009, with his remand scheduled until March 4.