Framing and Economic Growth
In a recent episode of his podcast, The Weekly Show, Jon Stewart discussed Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) initiatives. He argued that the messaging around these programs has been lost on the American public and that they are often framed in the wrong way.
Stewart believes that DEI should be framed as an economic issue rather than a social one. He argues that by focusing on the economic benefits of diversity and inclusion, such as increased access to talent and markets, these initiatives will resonate more with the public.
He uses the analogy of sports leagues, pointing out that they have only gotten better since allowing Black players to participate. He also cites the example of veterans, women, and people in poor neighborhoods who have been "walled off" from opportunities.
Stewart believes that DEI initiatives should focus on "reanimating" these "shriveled supply lines" and getting these communities involved in the economy. He argues that current DEI programs are not reaching these people and are instead focused on "what they can do, not what they should."
Stewart's perspective on DEI is unique and thought-provoking. By framing the issue in economic terms, he hopes to make DEI more appealing to a wider audience and ultimately lead to more effective programs.
6 Comments
Loubianka
Finally a discussion moving beyond politics into economics. DEI drives innovation and competitiveness.
Katchuka
Inclusion makes economic sense. Stewart wisely connects DEI to the prosperity of all. It's a win-win.
Loubianka
He's totally right—why wouldn’t businesses want full access to the most talented workforce they can get?
Katchuka
Absolutely on point. We should talk more about DEI as a competitive advantage for businesses and communities.
Noir Black
Economic framing won't resonate because DEI is inherently a social and moral issue—not a numbers game.
BuggaBoom
Stewart downplays how deep-rooted societal biases are. Economic arguments alone can’t reach hearts and minds.