Fiat or Crypto

Inaccuracies and Double Counting Plague Updated Savings Claims

Inaccuracies and Double Counting Plague Updated Savings Claims

For the second time in two weeks, the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) has released inaccurate information regarding its cost-cutting efforts. The updated "wall of receipts," which lists canceled contracts and claimed savings, shows a significant drop from the initial $16.6 billion figure, now totaling $9.6 billion. However, the total claimed savings have jumped to $65 billion, raising further questions about the validity of DOGE's reporting.

Several discrepancies have been identified in the updated receipts. Many contracts appear to be double, triple, or even quadruple counted, leading to inflated savings figures. Additionally, some contracts listed are unlikely to reach the claimed savings amount due to their specific nature and limited funding.

One example involves a $25 million contract for DEI training and assessment services for the Department of Agriculture. DOGE mistakenly listed each of the four companies involved as having a separate $25 million contract, claiming a total savings of $100 million. In reality, the companies drew funding from the single $25 million contract.

Another instance involves a Consumer Finance Protection Bureau contract cancellation, where two line items list $9,999,999 in savings, despite referring to the same contract. Similarly, a previously listed contract claiming $1.965 billion in savings has been revised to show one instance at $0.35, another at zero savings, and a third at $18,171,886.

Furthermore, DOGE has taken credit for the sale of a building in Washington, D.C., claiming it as savings. However, the building was actually auctioned off during the Biden administration for approximately $4 million.

These inaccuracies and inconsistencies raise concerns about the transparency and accuracy of DOGE's reporting. The significant discrepancies and double counting suggest that the claimed savings figures may be significantly inflated. Additionally, the lack of supporting documentation for the vast majority of the claimed savings further undermines the credibility of DOGE's reporting.

As DOGE continues to eliminate government contracts, tens of thousands of government employees and contractors have likely lost their jobs. The impact of these cuts on the government workforce and the overall economy remains to be seen.

Read-to-Earn opportunity
Time to Read
You earned: None
Date

Post Profit

Post Profit
Earned for Pluses
...
Comment Rewards
...
Likes Own
...
Likes Commenter
...
Likes Author
...
Dislikes Author
...
Profit Subtotal, Twei ...

Post Loss

Post Loss
Spent for Minuses
...
Comment Tributes
...
Dislikes Own
...
Dislikes Commenter
...
Post Publish Tribute
...
PnL Reports
...
Loss Subtotal, Twei ...
Total Twei Earned: ...
Price for report instance: 1 Twei

Comment-to-Earn

8 Comments

Avatar of Rotfront

Rotfront

“Reporting savings that jump from billions to tens of billions with errors is just unacceptable. Time for accountability.”

Avatar of Karamba

Karamba

“This exposes the lack of transparency in government spending. We deserve accurate reporting on how our money is saved.”

Avatar of Matzomaster

Matzomaster

“If that building sale is counted as savings when it wasn’t even under DOGE’s jurisdiction, you know there’s a big problem.”

Avatar of Karamba

Karamba

“The questionable figures, especially with the DEI training contract, show that something is seriously amiss.”

Avatar of Matzomaster

Matzomaster

“I’m shocked how easily numbers were misrepresented. It’s time for DOGE to clean up its act and provide clear documentation.”

Avatar of Leonardo

Leonardo

“These double and triple counts are troubling. How can we trust the reported savings when the math doesn’t add up?”

Avatar of Raphael

Raphael

“DOGE’s reporting inconsistencies are a red flag. If they can’t get the numbers right, how are we to trust their cost-cutting claims?”

Avatar of Donatello

Donatello

“Why focus on a few mistakes when the overall cost-cutting effort might still be effective? It feels like selective reporting.”

Available from LVL 13

Add your comment

Your comment avatar