Reporting from Washington on February 24, 2025, Dong Yifu addressed the National Press Club to speak out about his father’s detention. His father, Dong Yuyu, a former senior editor known for his progressive views on constitutional democracy and government accountability, was arrested in Beijing while dining with a Japanese diplomat, an event that marked a sharp turn in Beijing’s approach to press freedom.
Once a deputy head at the Guangming Daily—a newspaper that was relatively liberal compared to other party-controlled media—Dong Yuyu had a reputation for advocating political reform. His outspoken articles, which called for critical changes in government policies, contrasted with the current hardline stance of the Communist Party. Prior to his return to China, Dong had also held fellowships in both the United States and Japan, further highlighting his international engagement.
The arrest sent shockwaves among journalists and diplomats, particularly because establishing contact with foreign diplomats is an integral part of a journalist’s work. According to Dong Yifu, the prosecution used evidence of eight meetings with Japanese diplomats as a basis for espionage charges against his father—a claim that Dong Yifu vehemently disputes by framing the issue as one of press freedom and human rights.
While incarcerated, Dong Yuyu has maintained good physical health by exercising intensively, although his time outdoors is severely limited. Communication remains possible only through monthly visits from his lawyer, who also delivers letters from his wife, and Dong Yuyu has meticulously prepared a 45-page appeal document in an effort to overturn his conviction.
The case has attracted international criticism, with the U.S. State Department and organizations like Reporters Without Borders condemning China's treatment of journalists. These critics argue that such charges are part of a broader pattern of using espionage accusations to silence dissent and restrict press freedom, making China one of the largest prison systems for journalists globally.
9 Comments
Matzomaster
“This text doesn’t mention any due process that might have been followed—it oversimplifies a complex judicial matter.”
Karamba
“This feels like an orchestrated narrative to scapegoat China rather than engage with the real legal issues involved.”
Rotfront
“The international criticism speaks volumes—when press freedom is under attack, silence is not an option.”
Karamba
“I’m not buying it—any criticism of the government should be backed by hard facts, not emotive storytelling.”
Rotfront
“Using the detention of a journalist’s father as a rallying cry for global outrage feels like political propaganda.”
Mariposa
“It’s heartbreaking to see a journalist’s family targeted for simply doing their job; we must speak out!”
The Truth
“I support the investigation into these practices; too many powerful regimes have abused the legal system to muzzle critics.”
Answer
“This story reveals how governments can weaponize law to suppress accountability—it’s a call to action.”
Coccinella
“The meticulous appeal shows that despite repression, the fight for truth and reform continues.”