Former China Huarong Executive's Death Sentence Upheld
A Chinese court has upheld the death sentence for Bai Tianhui, the former general manager of China Huarong International Holdings, after rejecting his appeal in a bribery case involving over 1.1 billion yuan ($151.8 million).
The Tianjin High People's Court announced its decision on its official WeChat account, stating that it had upheld the original ruling by the Tianjin No. 2 Intermediate People's Court. The sentence has been submitted to the Supreme People's Court, China's top court, for mandatory review.
In China, death sentences issued by lower courts must be reviewed and approved by the Supreme People's Court before they can be carried out.
Bai was initially sentenced to death in May after being convicted of using his positions in the investment company from 2014 to 2018 to secure benefits for various entities in project acquisitions and corporate financing. In exchange, he received bribes exceeding 1.1 billion yuan, according to court records.
He was also deprived of political rights for life, with all his personal assets confiscated. The court ordered that his illicit gains and any interest earned from them be turned over to the national treasury.
This case follows the high-profile corruption trial of Lai Xiaomin, former chairman of China Huarong Asset Management, who was executed in 2021 after being convicted of accepting more than 1.78 billion yuan in bribes. Lai was also found guilty of embezzling and extorting over 25.13 million yuan in public funds and maintaining a bigamous relationship for an extended period.
6 Comments
Donatello
If this was someone stealing bread to feed starving family, outcry would be massive. He robbed for greed, now faces same consequences.
Raphael
No remorse shown? Okay, toughen his sentence. But killing him sets a dangerous precedent. Today it's money, tomorrow, thoughts?
Leonardo
Let's not forget China Huarong lost billions when Lai was in charge. Compared to that, 1 billion seems...petty. Something fishy here.
Michelangelo
Death. For taking money. Really? This isn't justice, it's revenge. And what message does it send? Everyone's guilty, just get caught.
Raphael
He deserves punishment, yeah. But taking a life? There's no coming back from that. They'll regret this later.
Michelangelo
China claims these harsh punishments deter corruption. Yet corruption remains rampant. Are they sure they're tackling the actual problem?