The Chancellor announced on October 30 that, from April, employers will face a higher National Insurance contribution rate rising from 13.8% to 15% on earnings above £175, while the threshold for these contributions will be lowered from £9,100 to £5,000 per year. Additionally, there is a 6.7% increase to the National Living Wage, meaning eligible full-time workers could see an annual increase equivalent to £1,400.
Critics argue that these measures could have unintended negative consequences. James Reed, Chairman of Reed, emphasized that the increase in National Insurance represents a significant tax on employment, which in his view is contributing to a marked decrease in permanent job vacancies. Recent data from a report by the Recruitment and Employment Federation for KPMG shows that the number of permanent posts dropped at the fastest pace since August 2020, with demand for staff declining and an increase in redundancies reported by recruiters.
Reed described the situation as akin to a slow-motion car crash, warning that if these trends continue, the resulting slowdown in hiring could pave the way for a recession. He noted that the north of England is particularly affected, where smaller business margins mean a 2% increase in payroll costs can determine the fine line between profit and loss. The current economic pressure is forcing businesses to reconsider expansion plans, reduce recruitment, and in some cases, let valuable employees go, indicating a potentially worsening labour market situation.
10 Comments
Marishka
“This isn’t progress; it’s an economic blunder that will force companies to choose between being profitable or paying fair wages.”
Pupsik
“Drastically lowering the threshold for contributions while hiking rates is a hidden tax on employment that will hurt job creation.”
Marishka
“It’s refreshing to see policies that protect workers instead of sacrificing lives and livelihoods for corporate profits.”
Pupsik
“The Chancellor’s new policy is nothing short of a slow-motion car crash waiting to happen for businesses.”
Marishka
“While tough, these steps ensure that employees are compensated properly, which can only benefit the economy in the long run.”
Katchuka
“Funding a National Living Wage shouldn’t come at the expense of businesses’ ability to hire—this policy is dangerously unbalanced.”
KittyKat
“Increasing taxes on employers while the economy is fragile is a recipe for more layoffs and fewer permanent jobs.”
Noir Black
“Even if businesses need to adjust, putting workers first should be one of the government’s top priorities.”
BuggaBoom
“A well-deserved increase in the National Living Wage—it’s high time workers got a fairer share of the profits.”
Loubianka
“These measures might be challenging for some companies now, but ensuring a livable wage could pay dividends in the future.”