Amid growing concerns over public dissatisfaction with Labour, Prime Minister Keir Starmer is weighing a major cabinet reshuffle that might include removing Chancellor Rachel Reeves from her position. Sources indicate that the reshuffle is part of a broader strategy to refresh the current lineup and respond to internal as well as public pressures arising from recent poll ratings.
In this proposed reshuffle, insiders reveal that Starmer is also considering moving Home Secretary Yvette Cooper to the Treasury, with the possibility of appointing his close ally, Pat McFadden, as the new Home Secretary to tackle lingering concerns about immigration. The decision comes as speculation mounts over changes within the Ministry of Defence, with figures like Luke Pollard or former Royal Marine Alistair Carns mentioned as potential candidates to replace Defence Secretary John Healey amidst disputes over defence spending.
A Whitehall source mentioned that the initial six-month period has been challenging for the government, evident in the declining poll ratings, leading to a consensus that significant changes are needed. The reshuffle process is reportedly active, with major adjustments anticipated to take place in the spring.
10 Comments
BuggaBoom
“The reshuffle strategy seems geared towards reinvigorating policy priorities – a needed step to tackle the current poll slump.”
Noir Black
“Refreshing positions can lead to better accountability and new perspectives. Hopefully, this shake-up revitalizes government performance.”
KittyKat
“If shifting roles helps address key problems, then I support this move. It’s about time for some fresh energy in key departments.”
Eugene Alta
“Sometimes a change in leadership roles is all it takes to spark innovation. I’m optimistic about the potential of new appointments.”
Katchuka
“Instead of reshuffling, the government should address the real issues head-on. This looks like an internal power play.”
Eugene Alta
“Starmer’s tactics appear desperate. Pitting cabinet roles around does not address the underlying issues that worry the public.”
Katchuka
“I fear this is merely a smoke screen to distract us from deeper policy failures – not the refreshing change we so desperately need.”
Loubianka
“Moving officials around for optics rather than expertise is a dangerous gamble. We deserve leaders focused on policies, not power plays.”
Karamba
“A bold move to switch things up could boost morale both within the party and among voters looking for change.”
Katchuka
“The focus on optics instead of substance is disappointing. This is a political stunt that hides a lack of genuine plans.”