Shinji Ishimaru recently held a news conference in Minato Ward, Tokyo, to present his newly established regional political party, Saisei no Michi, which translates to "The Path to Rebirth." Observers noted that his style was more akin to that of an entrepreneur than a conventional politician, as he outlined his strategy for participating in the upcoming Tokyo metropolitan assembly elections. Ishimaru's presentation resembled a business pitch, highlighting objectives like profitability, cost efficiency, and the development of future leaders within the party.
Ishimaru’s concept of a political party diverges from traditional views, as he suggests it should not be bound by specific policies. Instead, he intends for party members to vote independently in the assembly, with a rule in place restricting them to a maximum of two four-year terms once elected. While he claims his movement is about fostering public engagement in politics, the emphasis seems to be on securing candidates already deemed "work-ready," leading to direct entry for current assembly members and other high-ranking officials without stringent vetting processes.
Candidates will go through a selection procedure consisting of three steps, culminating in a brief personal interview with Ishimaru. Despite his assertion that reaching this final stage could enhance a candidate's reputation, critics may view the lack of a thorough review process as bias towards established politicians. Ishimaru also allows party members to maintain affiliations with other political organizations, raising further doubts about whether Saisei no Michi can genuinely qualify as a political party with a distinct mission.
Towards the end of the news conference, Ishimaru explained his rationale for establishing the party in Tokyo, citing his recognition in the area and the presence of influential swing voters. This assertion appeared to convey his understanding of the political landscape effectively, contrasting sharply with the inconsistencies potentially undermining the party's legitimacy.
5 Comments
Muchacho
This party lacks transparency and accountability. How can we trust them to make decisions in our best interest?
Coccinella
The lack of a clear vision and mission raises serious doubts about the party's commitment to tackling real issues.
Habibi
This party seems more concerned with promoting its members' careers than serving the public interest.
Africa
Focusing on profitability and cost-efficiency in a political party? This sounds like a recipe for corner-cutting and sacrificing quality.
Mariposa
The absence of a rigid ideology allows for flexibility and adaptation to the changing needs of the people.