Laws and Justice

Singapore Courts Implement Specialist Measures for Managing Sexual Offence Cases

On January 13, Chief Justice Sundaresh Menon revealed that Singapore's courts are taking steps to enhance how sexual offence cases are managed. Starting immediately, all sexual offence cases in the High Court will be overseen by a select group of experienced judges who have undergone specialized training. This initiative aims to ensure that the unique challenges posed by such cases are handled with the utmost care, considering the potential repercussions for both the complainants and the accused.

In addition to High Court cases, serious sexual offences in the State Courts will also be put under the jurisdiction of this specialist list. This list will include cases that involve situations of penetrative acts, exploitation of vulnerable individuals, abuse of trust, as well as instances involving deception or violence. Moreover, trials that include complainants or defendants with special needs affecting their ability to provide testimony will also be included.

Currently, there are seven judges assigned to the specialist list in the High Court and 12 district judges in the State Courts. These judges will receive enhanced training and resources aimed at increasing their expertise in sexual offence cases. To bolster case management, the courts will be initiating a pilot program that incorporates improved pre-trial checklists, allowing for a more structured approach to identifying critical issues before a trial begins. This checklist system is designed to streamline the proceedings while safeguarding the complainants’ rights and ensuring fair trial standards are maintained.

The Chief Justice also announced a new policy aimed at combating workplace harassment within the legal profession. This policy, part of a broader initiative on ethics and professional standards, includes a toolkit for law firms that outlines essential frameworks and procedures for mitigating harassment and bullying at work. Additionally, the recommendations highlight the necessity of including ethics as a compulsory subject in bar examinations to keep legal professionals updated on their ethical duties.

Read-to-Earn opportunity
Time to Read
You earned: None
Date

Post Profit

Post Profit
Earned for Pluses
...
Comment Rewards
...
Likes Own
...
Likes Commenter
...
Likes Author
...
Dislikes Author
...
Profit Subtotal, Twei ...

Post Loss

Post Loss
Spent for Minuses
...
Comment Tributes
...
Dislikes Own
...
Dislikes Commenter
...
Post Publish Tribute
...
PnL Reports
...
Loss Subtotal, Twei ...
Total Twei Earned: ...
Price for report instance: 1 Twei

Comment-to-Earn

6 Comments

Avatar of BuggaBoom

BuggaBoom

Having a specialized list of judges will help streamline complex cases and minimize trauma for complainants.

Avatar of Katchuka

Katchuka

How do we know this training will be effective? There’s plenty of research showing that training alone isn’t a solution.

Avatar of Eugene Alta

Eugene Alta

Specializing judges may create an impression that sexual offence cases are different from other serious crimes, which they shouldn't be.

Avatar of Loubianka

Loubianka

Doing this at the High Court level but not addressing it in lower courts feels disjointed. We need a cohesive legal strategy.

Avatar of BuggaBoom

BuggaBoom

This initiative respects the rights of both complainants and the accused. It's fair to ensure expertise in such sensitive matters.

Avatar of Eugene Alta

Eugene Alta

This sounds more like a PR move than a genuine effort to address the problems in our legal system.

Available from LVL 13

Add your comment

Your comment avatar