The author raises alarms over the extent of violent content being showcased on our screens, lamenting that even festive programming offered little respite from the gruesome portrayals of crime and death. There is an observation that not only television but also video games and social media contribute to the relentless exposure to violence, with no definitive conclusions regarding whether such portrayals lead to aggressive behavior in real life. However, it’s noted that some studies link media violence to increased anxiety levels, suggesting that viewers may perceive the world as a more threatening place.

Despite the known increase in violent crimes over the past five decades, the absence of comprehensive longitudinal studies on the impact of media violence—especially concerning youth—is troubling. Historical instances, like the public outcry following the murder of James Bulger and controversies surrounding horror movie characters, illustrate society's periodic reactions to perceived dangers from media. Although a report indicated a connection between media violence and behavior, it acknowledged that other social factors, such as family dynamics and personal backgrounds, also play significant roles.

while sensitivity to certain issues has increased—resulting in the policing of language and hate incidents—violence remains largely unchallenged in media. The author argues against a ban on content, recognizing that many can watch violence without adverse effects, but stresses the need for greater scrutiny over graphic depictions across media. This concern for the impact of media on viewers is displayed alongside the political landscape currently dominated by Labour's Keir Starmer.

Moving to political commentary, the author reveals that a recent poll indicated a significant number of voters believe Starmer may be ousted soon, reflecting the growing discontent with his leadership. While acknowledging that Starmer seems to be facing a challenging time, the writer expresses skepticism about his immediate departure from office, noting that Labour lacks robust mechanisms for removing its leaders.

The author further criticizes the overuse of the term "progressive" as complicated political jargon. By scrutinizing the proposals from the Institute for Public Policy Research, which seeks to relax ID requirements at polling stations and extend voting privileges to foreign nationals, the author contends that such changes would not be progressive but regressive instead. The focus on language at the expense of substance in media discussions is seen as a tactic to muffle important debates, particularly by major outlets like the BBC.

Concluding the commentary, the author expresses excitement about contributing to the Daily Express, promising to delve into significant political issues and share personal insights regularly. They share a hope for engagement with readers and announce collaborations with fellow writers like Vanessa Feltz.