Should King Charles find himself unable to carry out his royal obligations for a limited time, he can appoint two or more individuals known as 'Counsellors of State' to serve on his behalf. This group is empowered to conduct a majority of the sovereign's official tasks, such as participating in privy council meetings, signing everyday documents, and receiving new ambassadors' credentials.
However, certain essential constitutional responsibilities are not permitted to be delegated. These include matters related to the Commonwealth, the dissolution of Parliament unless explicitly instructed by King Charles, creating peerages, and selecting a new Prime Minister. According to the Royal Family's official website, the Counsellors of State consist of the sovereign's spouse and the next four individuals in the line of succession above the age of 21.
Last year, concerns emerged when King Charles had to reduce his official activities due to treatment for an undisclosed cancer condition, sparking questions about who would manage his responsibilities during that time. Royal biographer Marlene Koenig noted that typically two Counsellors would be named for assistance. The likely candidates in this scenario would be Queen Camilla and Prince William, particularly in light of the fact that Prince Harry and Prince Andrew would not be called upon for these roles.
Koenig elaborated that Prince Harry is effectively removed from the list of Counsellors since he no longer resides in the UK after losing his lease for Frogmore Cottage, suggesting that Princess Eugenie would take his place. She remarked that adjustments made by King Charles regarding Counsellors in 2022 were aimed at circumventing the need to summon the Duke of Sussex or the Duke of York for duty. As of late 2024, Buckingham Palace confirmed that King Charles will continue his medical treatment after a challenging year battling illness.
8 Comments
Murena
This delegation of power looks fishy. Can't King Charles just appoint competent people instead of rendering royal duties to family members?
Evgen II
It’s very responsible of King Charles to appoint Counsellors rather than overstrain himself while undergoing treatment. Health comes first!
Murena
I find it troubling that King Charles can just step back and allow others to make important decisions—this isn't how a constitutional monarchy should work!
Evgen II
Choosing family members for such a role sets a bad precedent. We need people who have the interests of the nation at heart, not just royal bloodlines.
Murena
This arrangement lets King Charles focus on his health without abandoning his responsibilities. It’s a win-win situation for everyone.
Leonardo
If the king can't represent Britain, it's time for him to step aside. The monarchy shouldn’t be a fallback option.
Raphael
I can’t support the monarchy when it essentially allows a royal to bypass their obligations. This is not accountability.
Donatello
I’m glad King Charles has a plan. Delegating certain duties shows he’s thinking of the nation’s best interests while focusing on his health.