UK MP Lee Anderson Proposes "Three Strikes" Eviction Policy for Anti-Social Families

This week, Lee Anderson, a Member of Parliament from Reform UK, is set to argue for the eviction of families he refers to as “feral” who allegedly create chaos for their communities. He is proposing a policy where individuals could be evicted from council housing after a series of infractions, saying that law-abiding citizens should not have to endure the negative impacts caused by these families. Anderson expressed his belief that the country is on the brink of becoming a lawless society, highlighting the troubles faced by those who are simply trying to contribute positively by going to work and respecting their surroundings.

In an upcoming debate, Mr. Anderson will further elaborate on his stance, suggesting that evicted families can find alternative accommodations, potentially even resorting to living in tents. He argues that when families with a history of disruptive behavior are relocated, they often replicate their problems in the new area, asserting that these households should be held accountable for their actions. According to Anderson, making a direct link between family behavior and housing security would deter antisocial behavior.

Research conducted by Savanta indicates a lack of confidence among the public in police abilities to manage antisocial behavior effectively, with a significant number of people feeling unsafe in their neighborhoods due to such conduct. Anderson supports the idea that strong consequences, like the threat of losing one’s home, would lead families to reconsider their actions. The strategy he proposes aligns with recommendations from a past government action plan, which also suggested eviction after three documented instances of antisocial behavior, accompanied by warnings.

However, organizations focused on community safety, such as Resolve, have raised numerous concerns regarding the feasibility of Anderson’s policy proposal. They highlight the complexity of antisocial behavior and advocate for an approach grounded in understanding underlying issues rather than a punitive system. Questions have emerged about what constitutes a “strike,” who would be responsible for making the determination, and the potential increase in homelessness as a result of the policy.

Responding to these concerns, a government spokesperson mentioned that social landlords already have tools at their disposal to remove tenants engaged in antisocial behavior. The government is committed to addressing such issues in communities, emphasizing efforts to increase local policing and implement stricter measures against persistent offenders.