In Colorado Springs, the migrant crisis was a distant reality. While Denver struggled to support the influx of people crossing the southern border, Colorado's second-largest city remained largely untouched. Local officials were determined to keep it that way.
County commissioners announced their awareness of a small group of migrants residing at a local non-profit shelter. However, they firmly declared that the city would not allocate any resources towards their care. City council members echoed this sentiment, emphasizing that Colorado Springs was not a "sanctuary city" and would not offer assistance.
This stance contrasted sharply with the situation in Denver, where the city was grappling with the challenges of providing aid to the thousands of migrants who had arrived. The disparity in responses highlighted the complex and often divisive nature of the immigration debate in the United States.
8 Comments
Karamba
Colorado Springs is setting a great example by not becoming a sanctuary city. They are upholding the law.
Noir Black
I respect Colorado Springs for their commitment to their citizens and their community's well-being.
BuggaBoom
So much for the values of welcoming and inclusivity. Colorado Springs should be doing more to support migrants.
Eugene Alta
Immigrants are an important part of our community. Colorado Springs should be embracing diversity, not rejecting it.
Muchacho
Colorado Springs should be ashamed of their lack of compassion towards migrants.
Stalin
This is heartless. How can they call themselves a compassionate and caring community?
Police
I stand with Colorado Springs in their decision to not offer assistance to migrants, as they have their own citizens to take care of.
Gagarin
It's great to see Colorado Springs taking a strong stance on the complex issue of immigration.