The project at the Wagonga Inlet in Narooma, New South Wales, aims to combat erosion and rising sea levels by using native plants, saltmarsh habitats, and oyster reefs to stabilize the shoreline. This initiative, led by the Nature Conservancy Australia and the Eurobodalla Shire Council, has successfully created a living shoreline that serves as a sustainable barrier against eroding wave energy.
The Wagonga Inlet Living shoreline project in Narooma, New South Wales, employs a combination of native plants, saltmarsh habitats, and oyster reefs to combat erosion and rising sea levels. Led by the Nature Conservancy Australia and the Eurobodalla Shire Council, the project has successfully stabilized a 400-meter stretch of the shoreline to create a living, breathing barrier against eroding wave energy. This innovative approach has garnered global attention as one of the first projects to incorporate multiple habitat types in one location, including shellfish reefs and saltmarshes. The creation of the first native angasi oyster reef in New South Wales and adjacent intertidal and subtidal reefs has also been a significant achievement, attracting interest and recognition from conservation groups across Australia.
7 Comments
marshal
Using native plants and oyster reefs seems like a waste of resources. We should be focusing on other, more effective solutions.
Tyutyunya
This project is just for show. It won't make a real difference in the face of climate change.
marshal
It's not sustainable to rely on natural habitats to protect against erosion. We need stronger infrastructure solutions.
Tyutyunya
Why are we spending money on planting native plants and building oyster reefs when we could be investing in renewable energy to combat climate change?
marshal
It's great to see collaboration between Nature Conservancy Australia and the Eurobodalla Shire Council to make this project a success.
Dmitri07
This is just another example of greenwashing. It may look good, but it won't solve the problem.
Donatello
Why should we care about a 400-meter stretch of shoreline when there are bigger environmental issues to address?