President Joe Biden has authorized Ukraine to use long-range missiles supplied by the United States to target positions within Russia. This decision, however, has been criticized for its timing, as many in the military community believe it has come too late to have a substantial effect on the war. For months, as the West deliberated over military aid, Russia has utilized the time gained to move vital targets, thereby minimizing the potential impact of the Ukrainian strikes.

Military analysts like George Barros from the Institute for the Study of War emphasize that Ukraine has needed the capability to reach Russian rear positions for a significant time. Recent strikes using MGM-140 Army Tactical Missile Systems demonstrated some effectiveness, but many key targets such as Russian aircraft have already been relocated beyond their range. The delay has allowed Russia to safeguard its most critical military resources, thus reducing the window for Ukraine to exploit this newfound ability.

Experts also claim that Ukraine's previous attempts to strike at key Russian assets, such as ammunition depots and airfields, were hampered without the necessary missile capabilities. The Biden administration was informed that the majority of the aircraft deploying glide bombs against Ukraine were now too far from Ukrainian reach. Consequently, military operations in Russia's vicinity have been less effective than they might have been with timely access to long-range munitions.

The criticism leveled at the US and its allies centers around their slow response to supporting Ukraine. Soldiers on the ground report they have not been able to plan effectively due to the unpredictable supply of military resources. While Ukrainian forces have always received some assistance, the timing and volume often fell short of their actual needs.

Political implications accompany Biden’s decision to allow missile strikes. There is a concern about how this will play out with the incoming administration led by President-elect Donald Trump, who has been critical of US support to Ukraine. Analysts suggest there is a pressing need for Ukraine to assure the new leadership of its strategic importance to American interests.

The military strikes may have political ramifications, potentially helping Ukraine gain support from the new administration by demonstrating the effective use of Western assistance. However, the window for making a considerable impact is narrowing, and military experts warn that the delays may have undermined Ukraine's ability to show strength in a way that would foster greater political backing.