In the United States, married couples have been able to access no-fault divorce for more than half a century, a legal option that has been deemed essential for aiding victims of domestic abuse and alleviating crowded family courts from complex divorce cases. Despite its benefits, concerns have emerged following comments made by now Vice President-elect JD Vance during the presidential campaign, where he expressed opposition to no-fault divorce. With the election of President Donald Trump and Vance, advocates have been vocal on social media, advising women contemplating divorce to act quickly, fearing that this option might be restricted.

While Donald Trump, a twice-divorced individual, hasn't actively pursued changes to the country's divorce regulations, Vance has criticized the ease of obtaining a divorce, remarking on the societal issues that arise when individuals can easily leave a marriage. Despite rising apprehension, even those who wish to make divorce more difficult do not predict immediate, sweeping changes to the existing laws. The lack of a coordinated national effort and the autonomy of states in determining divorce laws mean that significant alterations are unlikely to occur rapidly.

In conservative states, there have been discussions around removing no-fault divorce options from party platforms, with some legislative attempts introduced, though these have stalled. Oklahoma state Senator Dusty Deevers pushed for a bill that would prohibit filing for divorce on incompatibility grounds, deeming no-fault divorce as eliminating marital responsibilities. Other initiatives have similarly proposed changes to current laws, reflecting a cautious brewing concern among some lawmakers regarding the future of no-fault divorce.

Democratic lawmakers remain vigilant, drawing parallels to the recent overturning of the constitutional right to abortion as a precedent of how long-established rights could be revoked. The historical context of no-fault divorce reveals that before California adopted this option in 1969, couples had to demonstrate fault to obtain a divorce, often placing a significant burden on domestic abuse victims. The current divorce system varies widely, with 33 states maintaining fault grounds for divorce, while 17 states strictly offer no-fault options.

The push for reform has not gained significant traction since the late 1990s, when the focus shifted to the divorce rate and led to the introduction of "covenant marriages," but this option did not replace no-fault divorce. Advocacy groups continue to express deep concern about the potential rollback of no-fault divorce rights, especially with the changing political landscape, which may place additional pressures on women's rights and LGBTQ+ marital rights. As discussions around divorce regulations persist, opinions remain divided on whether the political climate will lead to substantial change.